Canna~Fangled Abstracts

Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 expression is involved in R(+)-methanandamide-induced apoptotic death of human neuroglioma cells.

By December 6, 2004No Comments
2004 Dec;66(6):1643-51. Epub 2004 Sep 10.

Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 expression is involved in R(+)-methanandamide-induced apoptotic death of human neuroglioma cells.

Abstract

pm1Cannabinoids have been implicated in the reduction of glioma growth. The present study investigated a possible relationship between the recently shown induction of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression by the endocannabinoid analog R(+)methanandamide [R(+)-MA] and its effect on the viability of H4 human neuroglioma cells. Incubation with R(+)-MA for up to 72 h decreased the cellular viability and enhanced accumulation of cytoplasmic DNA fragments in a time-dependent manner. Suppression of R(+)-MA-induced prostaglandin (PG) E2 synthesis with the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib (0.01-1 microM) or inhibition of COX-2 expression by COX-2-silencing small-interfering RNA was accompanied by inhibition of R(+)-MA-mediated DNA fragmentation and cell death. In contrast, the selective COX-1 inhibitor SC-560 was inactive in this respect. Cells were also protected from apoptotic cell death by other COX-2 inhibitors (NS-398 [[N-[2-(cyclohexyloxy)-4-nitrophenyl]-methanesulfonamide]] and diclofenac) and by the ceramide synthase inhibitor fumonisin B1, which interferes with COX-2 expression by R(+)-MA. Moreover, the proapoptotic action of R(+)-MA was mimicked by the major COX-2 product PGE2. Apoptosis and cell death by R(+)-MA were not affected by antagonists of cannabinoid receptors (CB1, CB2) and vanilloid receptor 1. In further experiments, celecoxib was demonstrated to suppress apoptotic cell death elicited by anandamide, which is structurally similar to R(+)-MA. As a whole, this study defines COX-2 as a hitherto unknown target by which a cannabinoid induces apoptotic death of glioma cells. Furthermore, our data show that pharmacological concentrations of celecoxib may interfere with the proapoptotic action of R(+)-MA and anandamide, suggesting that cotreatment with COX-2 inhibitors could diminish glioma regression induced by these compounds.
    PMID: 15361550 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

    LinkOut – more resources

    Full Text Sources

    • Icon for HighWire

    molecular pharmacologyThere is presently a renaissance in studying potential therapeutical effects of cannabinoids that exert a broad array of actions within the central nervous system as well as on immune, cardiovascular, respiratory, digestive, reproductive, and ocular functions. Although the antineoplastic activity of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), the principal psychoactive component of marijuana, has been known since the 1970s (Munson et al., 1975), cannabinoids have been no more than some years ago associated with the management of malignant brain tumors. In this context, cannabinoids have been shown to induce regression of malignant gliomas in rodents (Galve-Roperh et al., 2000). Different mechanisms have been proposed to account for the proapoptotic and antiproliferative effects of different cannabinoids on glioma cells (for review, see Guzman et al., 2001). In rat C6 glioma cells, Δ9-THC has been demonstrated to reduce cellular viability by a mechanism involving activation of cannabinoid receptors and sustained generation of ceramide (Galve-Roperh et al., 2000). On the other hand, a recent study suggests that the antiproliferative effects of the endocannabinoids anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol in these cells are mediated by a mechanism involving combined activation of cannabinoid and vanilloid receptors (Jacobsson et al., 2001). All together, the results of these and other studies suggest that there is no universal mechanisms by which plant-derived, synthetic, and endogenous cannabinoids affect cell viability and proliferation of glioma cells.

    A relationship between cannabinoids and prostaglandins (PGs) has been established by several lines of evidence. Therefore, various actions of cannabinoids within the central nervous system, including hippocampal neuronal death (Chan et al., 1998), dilation of cerebral arterioles (Ellis et al., 1995), psychoactive and behavioral effects (Burstein et al., 1989Perez-Reyes et al., 1991Yamaguchi et al., 2001), or reduction of intraocular pressure (Green et al., 2001) have been associated with an increased production of PGs. Recent studies from our laboratory have shown that cannabinoids induce the expression of the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 enzyme in human neuroglioma cells via a cannabinoid- and vanilloid receptor-independent pathway involving increased synthesis of ceramide (Ramer et al., 20012003). However, the functional consequence of COX-2 induction by cannabinoids in these cells has not been established so far.

    COX-2, which is encoded by an immediate-early gene, catalyzes the first step of the synthesis of prostanoids (for review, see Hinz and Brune, 2002). In recent years, COX-2 has been associated with cellular growth, survival, and differentiation (for review, see Gupta and DuBois, 2001Chan, 2002Subbaramaiah and Dannenberg, 2003). Thus, the induction of COX-2 expression by cannabinoids raises several questions referring to the viability of neuroglioma cells. Because COX-2-derived PGs have been implicated to result in resistance of cancer epithelial cells to apoptosis (Tsujii and DuBois, 1995), it could be expected that cannabinoids diminish their antimitotic and proapoptotic action by virtue of their capacity to induce COX-2 expression. On the other hand, studies performed on neocortical (Bagetta et al., 1998) and amnion-derived cells (Moore et al., 1999) suggest that induction of the COX-2 signaling cascade may sensitize these cells to apoptotic death. Moreover, and in line with a possible proapoptotic function of COX-2, inhibitors of this enzyme have recently been shown to attenuate the growth inhibitory and proapoptotic effects of different chemotherapeutic agents on ovarian epithelial cancer (Munkarah et al., 2003) and mammary epithelial cancer cells (Na and Surh, 2002).

    In the present study, we therefore examined a possible relationship between the induction of the COX-2 pathway by the endocannabinoid analog R(+)-methanandamide [R(+)-MA)] and its concomitant effect on the viability of H4 human neuroglioma cells. H4 cells represent an established epithelial-like neuroglioma cell line derived from a human brain tumor (Kim et al., 2000Krex et al., 2001Jayanthi et al., 2001). Our results demonstrate a substantial induction of apoptosis and cell death by R(+)-MA that is mediated, at least in part, by COX-2-dependent PGs synthesized upon treatment of cells with R(+)-MA. Moreover, our data imply that cotreatment with selective COX-2 inhibitors could diminish glioma regression induced by cannabinoids.

    Materials and Methods

    Materials. AM-251, AM-630, anandamide, capsazepine, NS-398, and PGE2 were purchased from Alexis Deutschland GmbH (Grünberg, Germany). C2-ceramide, dihydro-C2-ceramide, fumonisin B1, and R(+)-MA were purchased from Calbiochem (Bad Soden, Germany). Bisbenzimide, diclofenac sodium, and Δ9-THC were obtained from Sigma Chemie (Deisenhofen, Germany). Dulbecco’s modified essential medium with 4 mM L-glutamine and 4.5 g/l glucose was from Cambrex Bio Science Verviers S.p.r.l. (Verviers, Belgium). Fetal calf serum and penicillin-streptomycin were obtained from PAN Biotech (Aidenbach, Germany) and Invitrogen (Karlsruhe, Germany), respectively.

    Cell Culture. H4 human neuroglioma cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified essential medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. The cells were grown in a humidified incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2. All incubations were performed in serum-free medium.

    Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis. H4 neuroglioma cells were grown to confluence in 24-well plates. After incubation of cells with the respective test compounds or vehicle for the indicated times, supernatants were removed, and cells were lysed for subsequent RNA isolation. Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy total RNA kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany). β-Actin (internal standard) and COX-2 mRNA levels were determined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. In brief, this method uses the 5′→3′exonuclease activity of the Taq polymerase to cleave a probe during polymerase chain reaction. A probe consists of an oligonucleotide coupled with a reporter dye (6-carboxyfluorescein) at the 5′end of the probe and a quencher dye (6-carboxy-tetramethylrhodamine) at an internal thymidine. After cleavage of the probe, reporter and quencher dye become separated, resulting in an increased fluorescence of the reporter. Accumulation of polymerase chain reaction products was detected directly by monitoring the increase in fluorescence of the reporter dye using the integrated thermocycler and fluorescence detector ABI PRISM 7700 sequence detector (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany). Quantification of mRNA was performed by determining the threshold cycle (CT), which is defined as the cycle at which the 6-carboxyfluorescein fluorescence exceeds 10 times the standard deviation of the mean baseline emission for cycles 3 to 10. COX-2 mRNA levels were normalized to β-actin according to the following formula: CT (COX-2) – CT (β-actin) = ΔCT. Thereafter, COX-2 mRNA levels were calculated using the ΔΔCT method: ΔCT (test compound) – ΔCT (vehicle) = ΔΔCT (test compound). The relative mRNA level for the respective test compound was calculated as 2-ΔΔCT × 100%. RT-PCR reaction was performed using the One Step RT-PCR kit (QIAGEN GmbH). RNA samples were amplified using specific primers for human β-actin and COX-2 (TIB MOLBIOL, Berlin, Germany) as described previously (Ramer et al., 2001).

    Western Blot Analysis. Cells grown to confluence in 10-cm dishes were incubated with test substance or vehicle for the indicated times. Afterward, H4 neuroglioma cells were washed, harvested, and pelleted by centrifugation. Cells were than lysed in solubilization buffer [50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 μg/ml leupeptin, and 10 μg/ml aprotinin], homogenized by sonication, and centrifuged at 10,000g for 5 min. Supernatants were used for Western blot analysis. Proteins were separated on a 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel. After transfer to nitrocellulose and blocking of the membranes with 5% milk powder, blots were probed with specific antibodies raised to COX-2 (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany) and COX-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Heidelberg, Germany), respectively. Thereafter, membranes were probed with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated Fab-specific anti-mouse IgG (Sigma Chemie). Antibody binding was visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting detection reagents (Amersham Biosciences Inc., Freiburg, Germany).

    Determination of PGE2. H4 cells were seeded in 96-well flat bottom microplates at a density of 5 × 10,000 cells/well and were grown to confluence. Thereafter, cells were incubated with the respective test compounds or its vehicles for the indicated times in 100 μl of medium without serum. PGE2 concentrations in cell culture supernatants were determined using a commercially available enzyme immunoassay kit (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI).

    Cell Viability Analysis. H4 cells were seeded in 96-well flat bottom microplates at a density of 5 × 10,000 cells/well and were grown to confluence. Thereafter, cells were incubated with the respective test compounds for the indicated times in 100 μl of medium without serum. In experiments exceeding a 24-h incubation period, new medium and test substance were added daily. After the desired incubation time, cell viability was measured by the colorimetric WST-1 test (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). This cell viability test is based on the cleavage of the tetrazolium salt 4-[3-(4-Iodophenyl)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2H-5-tetrazolio]-1.6-benzene disulfonate (WST-1) by mitochondrial dehydrogenases in metabolically active cells.

    Detection of DNA Fragmentation. H4 cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 1.5 × 100,000 cells/well and were grown to confluence. Thereafter, cells were incubated with the respective test compounds or its vehicles for the indicated times. Adherent cells were harvested by trypsinization and combined with the detached cells. Induction of apoptosis was assessed using the cell death detection ELISAPLUS kit (Roche Diagnostics). This test is based on the detection of cytoplasmic histone-associated DNA fragments (monoand oligonucleosomes), which are generated during apoptosis. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed using 20,000 cells according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For detection of necrosis, histone-complexed DNA fragments were detected directly in the cell culture supernatant.

    Detection of Apoptotic Nuclear Morphology using Bisbenzimide. For detection of apoptotic nuclear morphology, cells grown to confluence in 35-mm dishes were incubated with test substance or vehicle for the indicated times. Afterward, supernatants were removed, and cells were washed and fixed in Carnoy’s fluid for 30 min and stained with 100 ng/ml bisbenzimide at room temperature for 10 min. After washing, cells were embedded under coverslips using glycerol [10%, v/v] and examined under a microscope equipped for epifluorescence illumination.

    Construction of Small-Interfering RNA (siRNA). siRNA against COX-2 was constructed as described by Elbashir et al. (2002) and synthesized by QIAGEN GmbH. The target sequence was 5′-aactgctcaacaccggaattt-3′ (bases 291-311 of NM000963.1) The siRNA sequence was controlled via BLAST search and did not show any homology to other known human genes. A negative (nonsilencing) control siRNA against the target sequence 5′-aattctccgaacgtgtcacgt-3′ was purchased from QIAGEN GmbH.

    Transfections. For DNA fragmentation assays or determination of COX-2 mRNA, cells were plated in 24-well plates and grown to 50 to 80% confluence. Thereafter, cells were transfected with COX-2-specific silencing siRNA or nonsilencing siRNA using RNAiFect (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) as transfection reagent, following the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, for each well 1 μg of COX-2 siRNA or nonsilencing siRNA was diluted in serum-free medium to give a final volume of 100 μl and incubated with 1 μl of RNAiFect for 15 min at room temperature. The transfection mixture was added to the respective wells, each containing 300 μl of medium (10% fetal calf serum content), to give a final concentration of 2.5 μg/ml. Transfection was performed for 24 h.

    For viability analysis, cells were seeded into 96-well plates, grown to 50 to 80% confluence, and transfected with 0.25 μg of siRNA or nonsilencing siRNA and 0.25 μl RNAiFect to give a final concentration of 2.5 μg/ml.

    For Western blots, H4 cells were seeded in six-well plates, grown to 50 to 80% confluence, and transfected with 5 μg of COX-2 siRNA or nonsilencing siRNA using 5 μl of RNAiFect per well. Transfection was performed for 24 h. The final concentration of siRNA or nonsilencing siRNA was 2.5 μg/ml. After transfection, cells were incubated with test substances in the presence of transfection complexes.

    Statistics. Comparisons between groups were performed with Student’s two-tailed t test. All statistical analyses were undertaken using Prism 3.00 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

    Results

    Time Course of R(+)-MA-Induced COX-2 mRNA Expression and PGE2 Synthesis. We have recently shown that incubation of H4 human neuroglioma cells with R(+)-MA (10 μM) for up to 24 h led to a sustained increase of COX-2 mRNA that peaked at 8 h (Ramer et al., 2003). Significant elevations of PGE2 levels were registered after incubation periods of 12 and 24 h, respectively (Ramer et al., 2003). Analysis of a broader time frame performed for the purpose of this study revealed that significant inductions of COX-2 mRNA expression and PGE2 synthesis were still evident after longer incubation periods. Therefore, COX-2 mRNA levels in cells treated with R(+)-MA for 48 and 72 h were 231 ± 25% (n = 3; Student’s t test P < 0.05, versus vehicle) and 226 ± 6% (n = 3; Student’s ttest, P < 0.001, versus vehicle), respectively, relative to COX-2 mRNA levels in vehicle-treated cells (100%). PGE2 levels determined in supernatants of cells incubated with R(+)-MA for 48 and 72 h were 433 ± 70% (n = 4; Student’s t test, P < 0.01, versus vehicle) and 426 ± 78% (n = 4; Student’s t test, P < 0.01, versus vehicle), respectively, relative to PGE2 concentrations in supernatants of vehicle-treated cells (100%).

    Time- and Concentration-Dependent Effect of R(+)-MA on the Viability and Apoptosis of H4 Cells. Analysis of cell viability by the WST-1 colorimetric assay revealed a time- and concentration-dependent cytotoxic effect of R(+)-MA on H4 cells (Fig. 1, A and C). The lowest survival rate was observed as an approximate 62% decrease in cell viability after a 72-h treatment with 10 μM R(+)-MA (Fig. 1A). A 48-h treatment with the same R(+)-MA concentration caused a 26% reduction in cell viability (Fig. 1A).

      Fig. 1.

    View larger version:

    Fig. 1.

    Time- (A) and concentration-dependent (B and C) effect of R(+)-MA on cytoplasmic DNA fragmentation and viability of H4 human neuroglioma cells. Cells were incubated with R(+)-MA or its vehicle for the indicated times (A), for 48 h (B) or for 72 h (C). For time-course experiments (A) accumulation of histone-associated DNA fragments in both the cytoplasm (apoptosis marker) or supernatant (necrosis marker) of H4 cells was determined. Percentage control represents comparison with vehicle-treated cells (100%) in the absence of test substance. Values are means ± S.E.M. of n = 3 to 4 experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 versus corresponding vehicle control, Student’s t test.

    To determine whether R(+)-MA-induced cell death was a result of apoptosis, cytoplasmic histone-associated DNA fragments were determined as a characteristic biochemical feature of apoptotic cell death. As shown in Fig. 1A, R(+)-MA led to significantly increased cytoplasmic levels of DNA fragments after 48- and 72-h incubation periods, respectively. R(+)-MA displayed a concentration-dependent effect on DNA fragmentation (Fig. 1B). Analysis of DNA fragments in supernatants as an index of necrosis revealed only a marginally significant (Student’s t test, P = 0.0521) increase in cultures treated with R(+)-MA for 72 h (Fig. 1A).

    Influence of Celecoxib and Other COX-2 Inhibitors on R(+)-MA-Induced Apoptotic Cell Death. To test a possible relationship between induction of COX-2 expression and apoptotic cell death elicited by R(+)-MA, the effect of the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib on R(+)-MA-induced apoptosis and cell death was examined. For this purpose, H4 cells were treated with R(+)-MA in the presence or absence of celecoxib. After a 24-h incubation of H4 cells with vehicle and R(+)-MA, respectively, average PGE2concentrations measured in cell culture supernatants were 0.038 μM and 0.24 μM, respectively (Fig. 2A). Coincubation of R(+)-MA with celecoxib (0.01-1 μM) concentration dependently diminished R(+)-MA-induced PGE2 formation (Fig. 2A) and afforded a concentration-dependent protection against R(+)-MA-induced DNA fragmentation (Fig. 2B) and glioma cell death (Fig. 2C). Incubation of cells with celecoxib without concomitant treatment with R(+)-MA had no significant effect on both accumulation of cytoplasmic DNA fragments and cellular viability (Fig. 2, B and C).

      Fig. 2.

    View larger version:

    Fig. 2.

    Effect of celecoxib (0.01-1 μM) on R(+)-MA-induced PGE2 formation (A), on the accumulation of cytoplasmic DNA fragments (B), and on the viability of H4 cells (C) in the presence or absence of R(+)-MA. Cells were incubated with R(+)-MA (10 μM), celecoxib or its vehicles for 24 (A), 48 (B), or 72 h (C). Percentage control represents comparison with vehicle-treated cells (100%) in the absence of test substance. Values are means ± S.E.M. of n = 4 (A), n = 3 (B), or n = 8 (C) experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 versus sole R(+)-MA treatment, unless otherwise indicated (Student’s t test).

    H4 cells were also protected from R(+)-MA-induced apoptosis and cell death by the selective COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 and the preferential COX-2 inhibitor diclofenac (Fig. 3). In contrast, the specific COX-1 inhibitor SC-560 failed to prevent apoptosis and loss of cell viability caused by R(+)-MA treatment (data not shown).

      Fig. 3.

    View larger version:

    Fig. 3.

    Effect of NS-398 (1 μM) and diclofenac (1 μM) on R(+)-MA-induced accumulation of cytoplasmic DNA fragments and subsequent death of H4 cells. Cells were incubated with the indicated substances, R(+)-MA (10 μM) or its vehicles for 48 h (DNA fragmentation) or 72 h (cell viability). Data are shown as percentage inhibitions of R(+)-MA-induced DNA fragmentation or cell death. Values are means ± S.E.M. of n = 3 (DNA fragmentation) or n = 4 (cell viability) experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 versus sole R(+)-MA treatment (Student’s t test).

    Influence of Celecoxib on R(+)-MA-Induced Changes of Nuclear Morphology. We further studied the morphology of nuclei in H4 cells by staining treated cells with the cell-permeable DNA dye bisbenzimide. Bisbenzimide binds to chromatin, allowing fluorescent visualization of normal and condensed chromatin. Cells undergoing apoptosis exhibit smaller and brighter nuclei because of chromatin condensation. Treatment of cells with 10 μM R(+)-MA for 48 h (Fig. 4B) increased the number of cells exhibiting nuclear condensation compared with cells treated with vehicle alone (Fig. 4A). H4 cells that were incubated with R(+)-MA in the presence of celecoxib at 1 μM (Fig. 4C) showed similar nuclear morphology as cells treated with vehicle. In contrast, nuclear chromatin condensation induced by treatment of cells with R(+)-MA was not prevented by concomitant incubation with SC-560 (Fig. 4D).

      Fig. 4.

    View larger version:

    Fig. 4.

    Bisbenzimide fluorescence microscopy of H4 cells after a 48-h treatment with vehicle (A), R(+)-MA (B), or R(+)-MA in combination with 1 μM celecoxib (C) or 1 μM SC-560 (D). Bisbenzimide intercalates into DNA strands, allowing fluorescent visualization of chromatin. Normal nuclei are regular in shape and size, whereas apoptotic nuclei show condensation of chromatin material and seem smaller and round-shaped (arrows). H4 cells incubated with R(+)-MA (B) or R(+)-MA in the presence of the COX-1 inhibitor SC-560 (D) show increased numbers of nuclei with condensed chromatin material compared with vehicle-treated H4 cells (A). Cells treated with R(+)-MA and the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib (C) show similar nuclear morphology as cells treated with vehicle.

    Influence of COX-2 siRNA on R(+)-MA-Induced Apoptotic Cell Death. The involvement of COX-2 in R(+)-MA-induced cell death was confirmed by experiments showing that transfection of cells with COX-2 siRNA significantly inhibited both DNA fragmentation and cell death by the endocannabinoid derivative (Fig. 5C). At the concentration tested, COX-2 siRNA was shown to interfere with R(+)-MA-induced COX-2 mRNA (Fig. 5C) and protein expression (Fig. 5A). In contrast, incubation of cells with R(+)-MA and COX-2 siRNA both alone and in combination was without any effect on COX-1 protein expression (Fig. 5A). Control experiments revealed no significant effect of nonsilencing siRNA on all parameters investigated (Fig. 5, B and D).

      Fig. 5.

    View larger version:

    Fig. 5.

    Effect of COX-2 siRNA (2.5 μg/ml) and nonsilencing siRNA (nonsil. siRNA; 2.5 μg/ml) on COX-2 or COX-1 protein expression (A and B), COX-2 mRNA expression (C and D), DNA fragmentation (C and D), and viability of H4 cells (C and D) in the presence or absence of R(+)-MA. Cells were incubated with R(+)-MA or its vehicle for 8 h (COX-2 mRNA), 24 h (COX-2 or COX-1 protein), 48 h (DNA fragmentation), or 72 h (cell viability). Transfection with COX-2 siRNA or nonsilencing siRNA was performed 24 h before addition of R(+)-MA to the cells. Percentage control represents comparison with vehicle-treated cells (100%) in the absence of test substances. Values are means ± S.E.M. of n = 3 (COX-2 mRNA, DNA fragmentation) or n = 4 (cell viability) experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, versus indicated group (Student’s t test). Results of the Western blots are representative of three experiments with similar results.

    Role of Ceramide in R(+)-MA-Induced Apoptotic Cell Death. Ceramide has recently been shown to be involved in COX-2 expression by R(+)-MA in H4 neuroglioma cells (Ramer et al., 2003). Likewise, C2-ceramide was shown to induce COX-2 expression, whereas dihydro-C2-ceramide was virtually inactive in this respect (Ramer et al., 2003). To investigate the impact of this upstream target conferring COX-2 expression, further experiments were performed using the ceramide synthase inhibitor fumonisin B1 and the cell-permeable short-chain ceramide analog, C2-ceramide. As shown in Fig. 6A, fumonisin B1 led to a significant inhibition of R(+)-MA-induced apoptosis and cell death. Moreover, the proapoptotic and cytotoxic effect of R(+)-MA was mimicked by C2-ceramide (Fig. 6B). In contrast, dihydro-C2-ceramide being used as a negative control did not significantly alter cytoplasmic levels of DNA fragments and viability of H4 cells (Fig. 6B). A possible necrotic effect of C2-ceramide over the investigated time period was excluded by analysis of DNA fragments in supernatants (data not shown).

      Fig. 6.

    View larger version:

    Fig. 6.

    Effect of fumonisin B1 (50 μM) on R(+)-MA-induced accumulation of cytoplasmic DNA fragments and subsequent death of H4 cells (A). Effect of C2-ceramide (30 μM) and dihydro-C2-ceramide (30 μM) on the accumulation of cytoplasmic DNA fragments and on viability of H4 cells (B). For analysis of DNA fragmentation, cells were incubated with the indicated substances for 48 h (A) and 24 h (B), respectively. Incubation periods for determination of cellular viability were 72 h (A) and 48 h (B), respectively. Fumonisin B1 was added 1 h before R(+)-MA. Percentage control represents comparison with vehicle-treated cells (100%) in the absence of test substances. Values are means ± S.E.M. of n = 3 (DNA fragmentation) or n = 4 (cell viability) experiments. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, versus indicated group (Student’s t test).

    Role of Cannabinoid and Vanilloid Receptors in R(+)-MA-Induced Apoptotic Cell Death. To examine whether the inhibitory effect of R(+)-MA on H4 cell viability might be the result of a cannabinoid- or vanilloid receptor-mediated pathway, experiments using the selective CB1 receptor antagonist AM-251, the selective CB2 receptor antagonist AM-630, and the vanilloid receptor 1 antagonist capsazepine were performed. However, all three compounds (tested at 1 μM) left the cytotoxic and proapoptotic effect of R(+)-MA virtually unaltered (Table 1). The same applies to the combined treatment of cells with the cannabinoid receptor antagonists (Table 1).

    TABLE 1

    Effect of AM-251 (1 μM), AM-630 (1 μM), and capsazepine (1 μM) on R(+)-MA-induced accumulation of cytoplasmic DNA fragments and subsequent death of H4 cells

    Cells were incubated with the indicated substances, R(+)-MA (10 μM), or its vehicles for 48 h (DNA fragmentation) or 72 h (cell viability). Receptor antagonists were added 1 h before R(+)-MA. Percent control represents comparison with vehicle-treated cells (100%) in the absence of test substances. Percent control represents comparison with vehicle-treated cells (100%) in the absence of test substance. Values are means ± S.E.M. of n = 3 (DNA fragmentation) or n = 4 (cell viability) experiments.

    Effect of Prostaglandin E2 on the Viability and Apoptosis of H4 Cells. To determine whether the major COX-2 product, PGE2, induces apoptotic cell death, H4 cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of PGE2 and monitored for cytoplasmic DNA fragments and cell viability. As shown in Fig. 7, PGE2 caused a concentration-dependent accumulation of DNA fragments (Fig. 7A) accompanied by a concentration-dependent loss of cellular viability (Fig. 7B). The administered concentrations of PGE2 were within the range of PGE2 concentrations observed in R(+)-MA-treated cells (Fig. 2A).

      Fig. 7.

    View larger version:

    Fig. 7.

    Effect of PGE2 (0.01-1 μM) on the accumulation of cytoplasmic DNA fragments (A) and on the viability of H4 cells (B). Cells were incubated with PGE2 or its vehicle for 48 h (A) or 72 h (B). Percentage control represents comparison with vehicle-treated cells (100%) in the absence of test substance. Values are means ± S.E.M. of n = 3 experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, versus corresponding vehicle control (Student’s t test).

    Effect of Other Cannabinoids on Cellular Viability and Apoptosis of H4 Cells. To determine whether the contribution of COX-2 expression to apoptosis of H4 human neuroglioma cells was unique for R(+)-MA or shared by other cannabinoids, additional experiments were performed with the structurally related anandamide and the phytocannabinoid Δ9-THC. In recent studies, both cannabinoids were shown to induce COX-2 expression and subsequent PGE2 synthesis in H4 human neuroglioma cells (Ramer et al., 20012003). According to our results, selective COX-2 inhibition by celecoxib significantly interfered with DNA fragmentation and cell death elicited by anandamide (Fig. 8). On the other hand, celecoxib caused only a partial and not significant inhibition of Δ9-THC-induced apoptosis and cell death (Table 2). In additional experiments, neither Δ9-THC-induced DNA fragmentation nor cell death was prevented by selective antagonists of CB1– and CB2 receptors or by a combination of both antagonists (Table 2).

      Fig. 8.

    View larger version:

    Fig. 8.

    Effect of celecoxib (1 μM) on anandamide (AEA)-induced accumulation of cytoplasmic DNA fragments and subsequent death of H4 cells. Cells were incubated with anandamide (10 μM) or its vehicle in the absence or presence of celecoxib for 48 h (DNA fragmentation) or 72 h (cell viability). Percentage control represents comparison with vehicle-treated cells (100%) in the absence of test substance. Values are means ± S.E.M. of n = 3 (DNA fragmentation) or n = 4 (cell viability) experiments. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, versus indicated group (Student’s t test).

    TABLE 2

    Effect of celecoxib (1 μM), AM-251 (1 μM), and AM-630 (1 μM) on Δ9-THC-induced accumulation of cytoplasmic DNA fragments and subsequent death of H4 cells

    Cells were incubated with the indicated substances, Δ9-THC (10 μM), or its vehicles for 48 h (DNA fragmentation) or 72 h (cell viability). Receptor antagonists were added 1 h before Δ9-THC. Percent control represents comparison with vehicle-treated cells (100%) in the absence of test substances. Percent control represents comparison with vehicle-treated cells (100%) in the absence of test substance. Values are means ± S.E.M. of n = 3 (DNA fragmentation) or n = 4 (cell viability) experiments.

    Discussion

    Recent investigations from our group have shown that R(+)-MA induces COX-2 expression in human neuroglioma cells (Ramer et al., 20012003). However, the functional consequence remained to be established. The present study addressed this issue and assessed the influence of COX-2-dependent prostanoids induced by R(+)-MA on the viability and apoptosis of H4 cells.

    Results from the present study are the first to show that newly expressed COX-2 contributes to the apoptotic effect of a cannabinoid on glioma cells. There are several lines of evidence supporting this notion: First, significant elevations of COX-2 mRNA and PGE2 were observed at the time of maximum apoptosis and cell death. Second, inhibition of R(+)-MA-induced PGE2 formation with the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib was associated with a concentration-dependent increase of the survival rate of R(+)-MA-treated cells, whereas the selective COX-1 inhibitor SC-560 was inactive in this respect. Analysis of histone-complexed DNA fragments and nuclear chromatin condensation revealed a high proportion of cells undergoing apoptosis after R(+)-MA treatment, suggesting that R(+)-MA toxicity in neuroglioma cells is predominantly caused by apoptotic cell death. Inhibition of COX-2 activity by celecoxib was shown to prevent cells from R(+)-MA-induced formation of cytoplasmic DNA fragments and nuclear chromatin condensation, whereas, again, the COX-1 selective inhibitor SC-560 had no such effect. Furthermore, H4 cells were also protected from R(+)-MA-induced apoptotic death by other selective (NS-398) or preferential (diclofenac) COX-2 inhibitors. Third, transfection of cells with COX-2 siRNA mimicked the inhibitory effect of celecoxib on R(+)-MA-induced apoptotic cell death. The specificity of COX-2 siRNA action was confirmed in Western blots showing down-regulation of COX-2 expression without any effect on COX-1 protein levels. Fourth, apoptotic cell death was also elicited by PGE2, the major prostanoid of the COX-2 pathway (Hinz et al., 2000), at concentrations that were well within the PGE2levels determined in supernatants of R(+)-MA-treated cells. Fifth, celecoxib also significantly interfered with the proapoptotic action of the endocannabinoid anandamide, which shares the capacity of R(+)-MA to induce COX-2 expression in H4 cells (Ramer et al., 2003).

    The lipid messenger ceramide has been implicated in R(+)-MA-induced COX-2 expression (Ramer et al., 2003). In this study, the ceramide synthase inhibitor fumonisin B1 was shown to suppress COX-2 expression by R(+)-MA. In the present work, further support for a proapoptotic function of COX-2 was provided by experiments demonstrating that fumonisin B1 also caused a significant inhibition of R(+)-MA-induced apoptotic cell death. Moreover, increased cell death was observed in the presence of the cell-permeable short-chain ceramide analog C2-ceramide, which also induces COX-2 in H4 cells (Ramer et al., 2003). In contrast, dihydro-C2-ceramide being used as a negative control left cellular viability virtually unaltered. Overall, these results are in line with studies showing that the apoptotic effect of cannabinoids in glial cells relies on increased ceramide generation by the enzyme ceramide synthase (Galve-Roperh et al., 2000Gomez del Pulgar et al., 2002).

    Additional experiments addressed the issue of a functional role for cannabinoid and vanilloid receptors in R(+)-MA-induced neuroglioma cell death. The phytocannabinoid Δ9-THC has been demonstrated to reduce the viability of C6 rat glioma cells by a mechanism involving both CB1 and CB2 receptors (Galve-Roperh et al., 2000). On the other hand, the endocannabinoids anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol have been shown to mediate their antiproliferative action in these cells by a mechanism involving combined activation of vanilloid and cannabinoid receptors (Jacobsson et al., 2001). However, in the present study no evidence for a functional linkage between the proapoptotic action of R(+)-MA and activation of either cannabinoid or vanilloid receptors was obtained. These data support recent observations showing that induction of COX-2 expression by R(+)-MA in H4 cells involves alternative receptor-independent signaling pathways (Ramer et al., 20012003). Further experiments revealed that apoptotic cell death elicited by Δ9-THC was likewise linked to a mechanism independent of cannabinoid receptor activation. However, in contrast to R(+)-MA and anandamide, Δ9-THC-induced apoptotic cell death was only partially and not significantly inhibited by celecoxib, suggesting that COX-2-dependent pathways play a minor role in this response. These data support results of other groups that argue for rather different molecular mechanisms underlying apoptosis and cell growth inhibition by plant-derived, synthetic, and endogenous cannabinoids (Jacobsson et al., 2001). However, the exact mechanism by which Δ9-THC causes apoptotic death of H4 cells has to be addressed in future studies.

    The results of our study raise one important question. As a matter of fact, our data are in contrast to compelling evidence implying a contribution of COX-2-dependent PGs to carcino-genesis (for review, see Gupta and DuBois, 2001Chan, 2002Subbaramaiah and Dannenberg, 2003). Therefore, overexpression of COX-2 in epithelial cells has been shown to result in resistance to apoptosis (Tsujii and DuBois, 1995). Moreover, COX-2-derived PGs may modulate the production of angiogenic factors, thereby inducing newly formed blood vessels that sustain tumor growth (Tsujii and DuBois, 1995). In rodent models of familial adenomatous polyposis, genetic deletion of COX-2 suppressed intestinal polyp formation (Oshima et al., 1996). Population-based studies have established that chronic intake of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) provides a 40 to 50% reduction in relative risk of death by colon cancer (for review, see Gupta and DuBois, 2001). Meanwhile, selective inhibition of COX-2 has been implicated as an effective strategy for treatment of patients with cancer or familial adenomatous polyposis (Steinbach et al., 2000). Likewise, treatment of various cancer cell lines with specific COX-2 inhibitors has been associated with inhibition of cell growth and induction of apoptosis. For example, growth inhibition of human cancer cells by a selective COX-2 inhibitor has been linked to inhibition of COX-2 activity and decreased synthesis of PGE2, the latter conferring increased clonogenicity and decreased apoptosis of these cells (Sheng et al., 1998). However, this issue deserves further discussion in that most in vitro studies focused on the single effects of NSAIDs on the proliferation of cancer cells using suprapharmacological concentrations of these drugs (Zhang et al., 1999Grosch et al., 2001Hwang et al., 2002Denkert et al., 2003). In particular, high concentrations of celecoxib and other NSAIDs were shown to retain their proapoptotic and antiproliferative properties in cells that do not express COX-2 (Zhang et al., 1999Grosch et al., 2001Hwang et al., 2002Denkert et al., 2003), suggesting that the anticancer activity of these compounds might also reflect COX-independent effects.

    In our hands, celecoxib inhibited R(+)-MA-induced apoptotic cell death at concentrations that were well within the pharmacological range of concentrations obtained in plasma of patients receiving celecoxib. Therefore, single-dose administration of celecoxib at 100, 400, or 800 mg yielded maximal plasma concentrations of 1.44, 2.54, and 7.67 μM, respectively (McAdam et al., 1999). At the concentrations tested in the present work, celecoxib itself did not induce apoptosis or cell death. On the other hand, the same concentrations of celecoxib were found to concentration-dependently interfere with the proapoptotic and cytotoxic action of R(+)-MA. These data are consistent with other reports. Therefore, the selective COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 has recently been shown to inhibit the proapoptotic and antiproliferative effect of paclitaxel, a frequently used chemotherapeutic agent, on epithelial ovarian cancer cells (Munkarah et al., 2003). Noteworthy, taxanes have been demonstrated to up-regulate COX-2 expression in different cells (Moos et al., 1999Subbaramaiah et al., 2000). In another study, the apoptotic death of human mammary epithelial cells elicited by the chemotherapeutic edelfosine was attenuated by celecoxib (Na and Surh, 2002). More recently, the growth of colon carcinoma Caco-2 cells stimulated by polyunsaturated fatty acids was found to be enhanced by indomethacin, partially through inhibition of peroxidation products generated by the COX pathway (Dommels et al., 2003). Furthermore, the proapoptotic action of the endocannabinoid-like compound stearoylethanolamide on C6 cells was shown to be associated with activation of prostaglandin formation (Maccarrone et al., 2002).

    All together, these data as well as the results of the present study raise the intriguing question whether the use of COX inhibitors before or concurrently with COX-2-inducing the latter agents may attenuate the therapeutic efficacy of anti-cancer compounds. This issue merits further investigation given that COX inhibitors are often coadministered during cancer treatment, but also unknowingly used by cancer patients for pain reduction.

    In conclusion, the present study suggests that R(+)-MA and anandamide cause apoptotic death of H4 neuroglioma cells by a mechanism involving de novo expression of COX-2. Because cannabinoids and inhibitors of endocannabinoid inactivation have been implicated as antitumorigenic substances (Guzman et al., 2001Bifulco et al., 2004), our results defining COX-2 as a novel target in the regulation of cell fate by R(+)-MA and anandamide shed light on an important step within this process. Moreover, our data show that suppression of COX-2 activity by pharmacological concentrations of the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib is accompanied by an inhibition of the proapoptotic action of R(+)-MA and anandamide on H4 neuroglioma cells, suggesting that cotreatment with COX-2 inhibitors could diminish the glioma-regressing effect of these cannabinoids.

    Footnotes

    • This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (HI 813/1-1 and SFB 539, BI.6).

    • ABBREVIATIONS: Δ9-THC, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol; PG, prostaglandin; COX, cyclooxygenase; R(+)-MA, R(+)-methanandamide, R(+)-arachidonyl-1′-hydroxy-2′-propylamide); AM-251, N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide; AM-630, (6-iodo-2-methyl-1-[2-(4-morpholinyl)ethyl]-1H-indol-3-yl) (4-methoxyphenyl)methanone; NS-398, N-[2-(cyclohexyloxy)-4-nitrophenyl]methanesulfonamide; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; WST-1, 4-[3-(4-iodophenyl)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2H-5-tetrazolio]-1.6-benzene disulfonate; siRNA, small-interfering RNA; CB, cannabinoid; SC-560, 5-(4-chloro-phenyl)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-trifluoromethylpyrazole; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

    • Received May 24, 2004.
    • Accepted September 10, 2004.

    References

    1. Articles citing this article

    Other Literature Sources

    Miscellaneous

    • pot logo blog2

    NPFP7FB