Skip to main content
Canna~Fangled Abstracts

Cannabis Policy in the 21st Century: Mandating an Equitable Future and Shedding the Racist Past

By July 16, 2023No Comments



doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.05.001.

Affiliations 

Free article

Abstract

The cannabis legalization movement in the United States has experienced unprecedented success in the past decade due to a wave of grassroots reforms in states across the country. The current legalization movement began in 2012, when Colorado and Washington became the first two states to legalize the use and sale of cannabis for adults aged ≥ 21 years. Since then, the use of cannabis has been legalized in 21 states, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and Washington, DC. Many of these states have explicitly framed the law change as a rejection of the War on Drugs and its harms, felt disproportionately in Black and Brown communities. However, racial inequities in cannabis arrests have increased in states that have legalized cannabis for adult use. Moreover, states working to implement social equity and community reinvestment programs have made little progress toward their goals. This commentary describes how US drug policy, racist in intention, gave way to drug policy that perpetuates racism, even when its ostensible or stated goal is equity. As the United States prepares for national legalization of cannabis, it is critical that we break away from past legislation and mandate equity in cannabis policy. Developing meaningful mandates will require us to acknowledge our history of using drug policy for the racist goals of social control and extortion, study the experience of states that are trying to implement social equity programs, listen to Black leaders and other leaders of color who have developed guidance for equity-focused cannabis policy, and commit to a new paradigm. If we are willing to do these things, we may be able to legalize cannabis in an anti-racist way that will stop causing harm and enable us to effectively implement reparative practices.

Keywords: Cannabis policy, Drug policy, Legalization, Liberalization, Social equity, War on drugs

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interest RTI International has no role in our decision to submit this manuscript. The views expressed are those of the authors alone and do not represent the views of RTI International.

MeSH terms

LinkOut – more resources


Leave a Reply