Skip to main content
Canna~Fangled Abstracts

Does acute cannabidiol (CBD) use impair performance? A meta-analysis and comparison with placebo and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)

By March 25, 2024April 15th, 2024No Comments


doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01847-w. Online ahead of print.

Affiliations 
    • PMID: 38528133

Abstract

Cannabidiol (CBD) is widely used and believed to be non-intoxicating, lacking acute performance effects (e.g., non-impairing). However, a synthesis of data has not evaluated this. This meta-analysis synthesized data from controlled human laboratory studies that evaluated if acute CBD use impairs performance. Performance on objective and subjective measures of cognitive and psychomotor function were used as markers for potential performance changes and impairment. Studies were identified through systematic database searches. Adult clinical trials measuring acute CBD effects (within 0-8 h of administration) were included. The primary outcome was the peak mean difference in performance measures between CBD and placebo. A secondary analysis utilizing delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) as a positive control for comparison to CBD was completed. Pooled Hedges’ g estimates were calculated using robust variance estimation (RVE) meta-regression. The omnibus RVE meta-analysis indicated a statistically significant, but small effect size (Hedge’s g < 0.2) for impaired performance following acute CBD consumption compared to placebo (N = 16 trials, Hedges’ g = 0.122, 95% CI: 0.023-0.221, p = 0.019). Measure type was a significant moderator with larger mean differences between CBD and placebo when subjective measures, specifically self-reported sedation, were used versus objective performance tasks (Hedges’ gSubjective = 0.288 versus Hedges’ gObjective = 0.048). Δ9-THC had a significantly greater magnitude of impairment compared to CBD (N = 8, Hedges’ g = 0.416, 95% CI: 0.017-0.816, p = 0.043). In summary, acute CBD consumption was associated with a small increase in subjective ratings of sedation, but no difference from placebo was observed across multiple domains of objectively assessed cognitive or psychomotor performance. These findings suggest that acute CBD alone is unlikely to significantly impair daily functioning or workplace performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Wadsworth E, Craft S, Calder R, Hammond D. Prevalence and use of cannabis products and routes of administration among youth and young adults in Canada and the United States: a systematic review. Addict Behav. 2022;129:107258. – PubMed – DOI
    1. Rotermann M. Looking back from 2020, how cannabis use and related behaviours changed in Canada. Health Rep. 2021;32:3–14. – PubMed
    1. Carnide N, Nadalin V, Mustard C, Severin CN, Furlan AD, Smith PM. Cannabis use among workers with work-related injuries and illnesses: results from a cross-sectional study of workers’ compensation claimants in Ontario, Canada. BMJ Open. 2023;13:e072994. – PubMed – PMC – DOI
    1. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. UNODC World Drug Report 2022 highlights trends on cannabis post-legalization, environmental impacts of illicit drugs, and drug use among women and youth. United Nations: Office on Drugs and Crime. 2021. www.unodc.org/unodc/en/frontpage/2022/June/unodc-world-drug-report-2022-… . Accessed 3 January (2024).
    1. Wilson-Poe AR, Smith T, Elliott MR, Kruger DJ, Boehnke KF. Past-year use prevalence of cannabidiol, cannabigerol, cannabinol, and Δ8-tetrahydrocannabinol among US adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e2347373. – PubMed – PMC – DOI

LinkOut – more resources


Leave a Reply