Canna~Fangled Abstracts

"The difference is in the tomato at the end": Understanding the motivations and practices of cannabis growers operating within Belgian Cannabis Social Clubs.

By March 11, 2018No Comments
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Mar 11;56:21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.02.016.
[Epub ahead of print]

Abstract

PM 2 site 207BACKGROUND:

In Belgium, Cannabis Social Clubs (CSCs) collectively organize the cultivation and distribution of cannabisfor the personal use of their members. In this paper we seek to improve understanding of the motivations and practices of cannabis growers operating within CSCs, shedding light on the cultivation process.

METHODS:

We draw on data gathered through face-to-face semi-structured interviews with the directors of seven active Belgian CSCs (n = 21) and CSC growers (n = 23). These data are complemented by additional fieldwork and a review of policies relating to CSCs’, including bylaws and growing protocols.

FINDINGS:

The Belgian CSCs rely on single and multiple in-house grower arrangements. Most CSC growers had been cultivating cannabis prior to joining their current CSC, albeit growing in different contexts (non-commercial and commercial). The CSC growers discussed both ideological and pragmatic motives for operating within a CSC. Cultivation took place indoors and followed organic practices. Despite their small-scale (20 plants on average), the grow sites used specialized equipment. The growers reported receiving financial compensation to cover production costs.

CONCLUSION:

This paper offers new insights into a particular sector of domestic cannabis cultivation – CSC growers and their practices within those collectives – which has not been studied previously. The Belgian CSCs have decentralized production among small-scale grow sites, at a size comparable to that found in other small-scale cultivation studies. In terms of motivations and practices, CSC growers share some features typically ascribed to small-scale cannabis cultivators. At the same time, CSC growers seemed particularly engaged with the CSC model and willing to adhere to the (self-)regulated practices developed by the organizations. This had implications for the way cultivation was organized and for the role of the grower within the CSC.

KEYWORDS:

Cannabis; Cannabis Social Club; Grower; Qualitative research; Small-scale cultivation; Supply

PMID: 29539581

 

DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.02.016
twin memes II