Cannabis; adverse effects from an oromucosal spray

Introduction:

Marijuana (cannabis) is the most commonly abused illicit psychoactive drug. The real extent of marijuana use is unclear but, for example, even about 50% of dental students in the UK in one recent study had used illicit drugs, including marijuana.¹
Derived from Cannabis sativa or Cannabis indica, the main active chemical of this recreational drug is THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol), which binds to central nervous system (CNS) receptors, influencing pleasure, memory, thought, concentration, sensory and time perception, and coordinated movement.
Medical use of marijuana in UK and other countries has reported benefits especially in management of chronic pain, multiple sclerosis and depression, arthritis and neuropathy.^2,3 In the USA, 36 states and the District of Columbia have had statutes that address the issue within the past 26 years, but several of those states have either repealed the laws or allowed them to sunset and, since 1996, 11 states have enacted laws that allow individuals to use marijuana with a physician’s consent,⁴though the Federal Government still maintains strict prohibitions. However, the US Supreme Court has considered sympathetically, cases involving people who smoke marijuana to alleviate their illnesses.
In 1971 the World Health Organization (WHO) pronounced cannabis medically useless and its use was regulated in many countries including the UK. However, the UK law appears to be relaxing and a Select Committee of the House of Lords subsequently argued that more research was necessary, in view of anecdotal reports of the efficacy of cannabis in controlling pain and tremor, particularly in multiple sclerosis (MS).
There are three main forms of cannabis: marijuana, hash and hash oil, all of which contain the main psychoactive constituent THC. Marijuana is most commonly smoked, but it can be added to foods. Recently, a mouth spray has been developed from the major components of marijuana, including THC and cannabidiol (CBD), in alcohol with a peppermint flavour (Sativex^® oromucosal spray, GW Pharmaceuticals, UK). This is designed to be administered as a spray under the tongue or on the buccal mucosa. Canada became, in April 2005, the first country to approve this oromucosal spray, a move that could shift the medical marijuana debate in the US and elsewhere. The drug is available in Canadian pharmacies, principally for the treatment of pain from MS, marketed by Germany’s Bayer HealthCareAG.
The drug has had no licence for use in the UK, and a licence was refused by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), but the UK Home Office Minister has agreed to its use in special circumstances. Sativex^® thus remains a controlled drug in line with stated government policy, but can be obtained from doctors who have a Home Office license. These physicians can prescribe it on a named patient basis, the system available for the use of unlicensed medicines: in accordance with the Medicines Act, a medicine which has yet to be licensed in the UK may be prescribed and supplied in response to an unsolicited request to fulfil the special needs of an individual patient under a physician’s direct personal responsibility.
The oromucosal marijuana spray appeared, in a UK randomised controlled trial, to be effective in reducing central neuropathic pain and sleep disturbance in MS.⁵ The drug was significantly superior to placebo in reducing the mean intensity of pain and sleep disturbance, and was generally well tolerated, although more patients than those using placebo reported dizziness, dry mouth, and somnolence.⁵ The oromucosal marijuana spray has also been used in rheumatoid arthritis, when a significant analgesic effect was observed and disease activity was significantly suppressed.^6,7 At least five randomised controlled trials have now confirmed its efficacy in a range of conditions.^8,9,10
We encountered a chair-bound patient with MS requiring restorative dental care who, on examination, had evidence of symptomless white lesions in the floor of mouth/ventrum of tongue, with no obvious causal factors, apart from use of the cannabis oromucosal spray. We thus undertook an open observational study of a small series of such patients.

Patients and methods:

A small open observational study was conducted on a series of nine patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) using a marijuana oromucosal spray as part of a UK trial on its efficacy in MS pain, which had local Ethics Committee approval. None of the patients were using topical oral medicaments apart from dentifrices.
The oromucosal spray (Sativex^® oromucosal spray, GW Pharmaceuticals, UK) delivers 2.7 mg of THC and 2.5 mg of CBD, and patients gradually self-titrate to a recommended maximum of 48 sprays in 24 hours. The spray contains approximately 50% v/v alcohol, in a propylene glycol base, and each 100 μl actuation contains up to 0.04 g alcohol.
Patients, all of whom had been using the spray for at least four weeks, were asked to attend for oral examination. Patients were asked whether they had ever experienced symptoms (dryness; bad taste; stinging) associated with use of the spray. A standard oral examination was carried out using a dental light, and the presence of any mucosal lesions recorded. Where mucosal lesions were present, the patient was advised to discontinue the spray and re-attend after four weeks for re-examination. For ethical reasons, biopsies were not undertaken at the first visit.

Results:

The results are shown in Table 1. Of nine patients invited to participate, eight attended (five female). All admitted to a stinging sensation on using the oromucosal cannabis spray, but none complained of dryness or bad taste and only four had oral mucosal white lesions in the floor of mouth. The lesions in three were clinically very obvious (Fig. 1), but in one were equivocal. The lesions were soft white homogeneous lesions which did not remove with gauze, clinically resembling a sublingual keratosis or a burn. All lesions visibly resolved or decreased by a second visit. Biopsies were therefore not undertaken.