Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol increases C6 glioma cell death produced by oxidative stress.
Source
Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Herzel Street, Rehovot 76100, Israel. igor.goncharov@weizmann.ac.il
Abstract
- PMID:
15975726
[PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]
MeSH Terms, Substances
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Biological Transport
- CHO Cells
- Cell Death/drug effects*
- Cell Line, Tumor
- Cell Survival/drug effects
- Cricetinae
- Deoxyglucose/pharmacokinetics
- Glioma/pathology*
- HeLa Cells
- Humans
- Oxidative Stress/physiology*
- Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1/drug effects
- Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1/physiology
- Tetrahydrocannabinol/toxicity*
Substances
LinkOut – more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Abbreviations
- CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
- DMPO, 5′,5′-dimethyl-1-pyroline N-oxide;
- ESR, electron spin resonance;
- LDH, lactate dehydrogenase;
- MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide;
- Qcb, 2-phenyl-4-(butylamino)-naphtholquinoline-7,12-dione;
- Qn, 2-phenyl-5-nitronaphtho(2,3-g)indole-6,11-dione;
- ROS, reactive oxygen species;
- THC, (−)Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol
Figures and tables from this article:
-
Fig. 1.
Effect of short THC treatment on C6 cell viability following oxidative stress. Following 10 min of pretreatment with either 0.5 or 2 μM THC, synthetic quinone Qcb (50 nM) was added and the cells further incubated for 1 h. The cannabinoid antagonists SR141716 and SR144528 were added (where indicated) at final concentration of 2 μM 1 h prior to THC treatment. (A) Medium aliquots were taken every 30 min and assayed for LDH release. (B) MTT viability assay; cells were kept for additional 12 h and assayed for formazan formation. Cell viability in control cells (without THC) is taken as 100%. Values represent the average of three independent experiments ±S.E.M. Levels of significance ranged from **P<0.01 to * P<0.05 compared with control.
-
Fig. 2.
Effect of extended THC treatment on C6 cell viability following oxidative stress. Following 72 h with THC at the indicated concentrations, cells were treated with quinone for 1 h and analyzed for (A). LDH release and (B). MTT viability assay (formazan formation). Values represent the average of three independent experiments ±S.E.M. Levels of significance ranged from *** P<0.001 to ** P<0.01 compared with control.
-
Fig. 3.
Effect of THC treatment and glucose starvation on C6 cells. Cells were transferred to serum- and glucose-free medium and treated with 0.5 or 2 μM THC. After 36 h the cells were analyzed for: (A). LDH release and (B). MTT assay. No quinone was used in this experiment. Values represent the average of three independent experiments ±S.E.M. Levels of significance ranged from ** P<0.01 to * P<0.05 compared with control.
-
Fig. 4.
Effect of THC treatment on LDH release following glucose starvation combined with oxidative stress. Following 36 h of glucose starvation in the presence of THC, at the indicated concentrations, cells were treated with quinone and analyzed for LDH release. Values represent the average of three independent experiments ±S.E.M. Levels of significance ranged from ** P<0.01 to * P<0.05 compared with control.
-
Fig. 5.
Effect of THC on glucose uptake in C6 cells. C6 cells were incubated for 24 or 48 h with either 0.5 or 2 μM THC. Untreated cells served as control. The uptake of 3Hdeoxy-glucose is given as percentage of the uptake by control cells and is the mean of three experiments. Values represent the average of three independent experiments ±S.E.M. Levels of significance ranged from ** P<0.01 to * P<0.05 compared with control.
-
Fig. 6.
Effect of THC on the interaction of DMPO with ·OH radicals. Generation of ROS was induced by photolysis of H2O2(3%) with white light in the presence of DMPO (0.1 M) and the indicated concentrations of THC. The rate of ROS formation was measured by testing the peak intensity of the second component of DMPO spin adduct. Inset: Representative example of DMPO spin adduct ESR spectrum (obtained after 5 min of H2O2 photolysis). Values represent the average of three independent experiments ±S.E.M. Levels of significance ranged from *** P<0.001 to **P<0.01 compared with control.
Copyright © 2005 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.