Role of the Endocannabinoid System in the Central Regulation of Nonmammalian Vertebrate Reproduction

2. Functional Relevance of Cannabinoid Receptors in Teleost and Amphibian CNS

After the first discovery of CB1 cannabinoid receptors in mammals [8, 9], the cloning of two genes coding for the CB1 receptor subtypes CB1A and CB1B in the bony fish Fugu rubripes [10] represented a true milestone in the ECS comparative investigations. Since then, duplicate copies of either the CB1 or CB2 genes (CNR1, CNR2) or both have been reported in several teleost species. In the puffer fish Fugu rubripes, as already mentioned, two CB1 receptor genes, but only one CB2 gene, are present [10, 11], consistently with the finding of two CB1 genes and one CB2 gene in another puffer fish species,Tetraodon nigroviridis [2, 12]. On the other hand, in the zebrafish Danio rerio, only one CB1 gene has been detected [13], while two CB2 genes (CB2A and CB2B) are present [14]. In the goldfish Carassius auratus, only one CB1 and one CB2 sequences have been cloned so far [15–17]. In the sole Solea solea, two CB1 (CB1A and CB1B) were identified [18], while in Pelvicachromis pulcher [19], Sparus aurata[20], and Apteronotus leptorhynchus [21] only one CB1 gene has been cloned. The presence of duplicate genes is a well known phenomenon in teleosts [22] and can be ascribed to a whole-genome duplication that occurred during evolution of the ray-finned lineage before the teleost radiation. At least three different events have been suggested to occur after gene duplication: (1) one gene of the pair evolves as a pseudogene through degenerative mutations and is eliminated because of its dispensability (most frequent event); (2) duplicate genes are preserved and remain functional; in this case, one copy can acquire a mutation conferring a new and beneficial function (neofunctionalization), whereas the other retains the original function; (3) duplicate genes can be preserved and share the multiple functions of the ancestral gene by complementary loss of subfunctions. Thus far, the functional significance of the differential retention of duplicate CB1 or CB2 genes in different teleost lineages is mostly unknown. In one report [14] the expression of CB2A and CB2B has been compared by RT-PCR in various zebrafish tissues, showing a similar distribution with few exceptions (brain and muscle, where CB2A was very low); however, no functional conclusions can be drawn from this study. Recently Palermo et al. [18] showed that in Solea solea in a stress paradigm CB1B mRNA levels were significantly reduced in ovary and brain of stressed fish, while CB1A mRNA remained unchanged, suggesting a possible subfunctionalization of the two duplicate genes.
For what concerns amphibians, CB1 cannabinoid receptors have been cloned and characterized in the rough-skinned newt Taricha granulosa [23], in the African clawed frog Xenopus laevis [24] and in the green frog Rana esculenta [25], while the presence of a CB2 gene has been revealed in Xenopus tropicalis[2].
Since the distribution of a receptor could give information on its physiological role, a number of studies have been conducted to characterize the localization of cannabinoid receptors.

2.1. Distribution of CB1/CB2 Cannabinoid Receptors in Teleost CNS

Although the puffer fish was the first nonmammalian species where CB1 receptors were identified, little is known about cannabinoid receptor distribution in this species. The few available data [10] outline, however, that CB1 receptors are highly expressed in the brain and they are present at lower levels in nonneural tissues, thus indicating an evolutionarily conserved feature common to all vertebrates.
The first data on CB1 receptor distribution in the brain of a teleost were obtained in the African cichlidPelvicachromis pulcher [16, 19]. By using immunohistochemical techniques, abundant CB1-immunostainings were observed throughout the telencephalon, in the preoptic area, lateral infundibular lobes of the posterior hypothalamus and pituitary gland, thus suggesting that cannabinoids affect neuroendocrine mechanisms and might indeed be involved in the control of reproduction. An intense CB1-immunoreactivity was also detected in the pretectum and nucleus glomerulosus of the posterior tuberculum, both transitional areas between pro- and mesencephalon, that are involved in the integration of visual-motor activities in order to orient fish toward preys and elicit appetite [26–28]. In the dorsal mesencephalic tegmentum, some large intensely CB1-immunopositive nerve cells, possibly motor neurons of the III cranial nerve, were observed. In the cerebellum, few granule cells and Purkinje cells were stained, as well as a number of α-motoneurons in the spinal cord.
A study in the goldfish [15] showed that CB1-immunoreactivities are distributed through all the forebrain, including the olfactory bulbs. Abundant immunostainings were observed in the inferior lobes of the posterior hypothalamus surrounding the third ventricle lateral recesses; these brain areas are involved in bony fish feeding response, thus providing morphological evidence for the reported involvement of the endocannabinoid system in the goldfish appetite control. The same CB1-immunopositive brain regions are also pivotal for the control of teleost reproduction, the involvement of the ECS being also supported by the finding of CB1-immunopositive fibres in the goldfish infundibulum, but not in the pituitary (Cottone, unpublished data), contrary to what was observed inPelvicachromis pulcher, where pituitary CB1-immunopositive cells were instead observed [29]. In the goldfish, a number of CB1 immunostained cell bodies were also detected in the telencephalon immediately below the ventricular ependyma and were identified as radial glial cells [29, 30]; these cells are very abundant in adult fish, probably due to the absence of astrocytes and ependymal cells and do serve mostly as neural progenitors and newborn neuron migrating scaffolds, as well as neurosteroid-producing cells. The expression of cannabinoid receptors in goldfish radial glial cells does therefore suggest an ECS regulation of neurogenesis in fish, according to what occurred in mammals (for a review [31]).
In zebrafish, CB1 distribution was analysed both in larvae and adult brains, by means of in situhybridization (ISH) [13]. An early CB1 mRNA expression was detected in the preoptic area of the hypothalamus and, later, within the dorsal telencephalon and mesodiencephalon. In postembryonic larvae and adult brain CB1 mRNA is primarily expressed in the dorsal telencephalon, synencephalon, torus longitudinalis, and periventricular hypothalamus, thus suggesting the involvement of the ECS in cognitive processes and neurogenesis.
Very recently, Harvey-Girard et al. [21] presented data on CB1 receptor distribution in the brain of the weakly electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus. Accordingly with what was observed in the other teleosts, CB1 mRNA is expressed mainly in the telencephalon (especially in subpallial neurons and dorsocentral telencephalon) and in fewer cells in the rest of the brain. CB1 distribution seems to reflect a possible role in the regulation of the electrosensory system and electrocommunication that are particularly developed and important in gymnotiform fish.
Since CB2 receptor genes have been identified in nonmammalian vertebrates more recently than CB1, data about their distribution are scarce. For instance, Rodriguez-Martin et al. [14] have shown in zebrafish by ISH that CB2 mRNA is expressed in the rostral and proximal pars distalis of the pituitary gland, while expression in the brain was only detected by RT-PCR. In goldfish CB2 mRNA has been detected in the brain, although at levels much lower than CB1 mRNA [17] and the immunostaining of goldfish forebrain sections did actually reveal the presence of CB2-immunopositive cells that were identified as radial glial cells, that is, adult neural progenitors [30].

2.2. Distribution of CB1/CB2 Cannabinoid Receptors in Amphibian CNS

The first report on the occurrence of the ECS in the amphibian CNS concerned the pharmacological and molecular characterization of CB1 receptors in the urodele amphibian Taricha granulosa [23]. In this same species, ISH experiments showed CB1 mRNA expression in the telencephalon, in particular in the olfactory bulb, pallium, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and nucleus amygdalae dorsolateralis; CB1 mRNA is also expressed in regions of the preoptic area, thalamus, midbrain tegmentum and tectum, cerebellum, and the stratum griseum of the hindbrain [32].
The distribution of CB1 receptor has been also investigated in the CNS of adults and embryos/larvae of the anuran amphibian Xenopus laevis. In particular, in whole embryos of Xenopus laevis CB1 mRNA was first detected at stage 28, and from stage 41 it appears in the rhombencephalon and thereafter also in the olfactory placodes and then in the olfactory bulbs [33]. In adult Xenopus laevis, CB1-immunostainings and CB1 mRNA-positive cells were detected in the olfactory bulb, dorsal and medial pallium, striatum and amygdala, thalamus and hypothalamus, mesencephalic tegmentum, cerebellum and spinal cord [24, 34, 35]. Moreover, CB1 receptors were detected in lactotrophs, gonadotrophs, and thyrotrophs of the pituitary gland [36].
In the green frog Rana esculenta CB1 immunostained neurons and nerve fibres are abundant in the telencephalic hemispheres, preoptic area, hypothalamus, and a number of hindbrain areas [37, 38]. Interestingly, fluctuations during the annual sexual cycle of CB1 mRNA expression in various regions of the brain, as well as at the testicular level, have been reported and a possible involvement of the ECS in the regulation of gonadal activity has been postulated [38, 39].
On the basis of their neuroanatomical distribution and relationships with a number of other signalling molecules [34, 35], the amphibian CB1 cannabinoid receptors have been mainly considered modulators in sensory and sensorimotor integrations and endocrine and behavioral outputs. Moreover, since the intense CB1 mRNA ISH staining found in Taricha granulosa amigdaloid complex [32] well matched the strong CB1-immunoreactivity and mRNA expression in the corresponding nucleus of Xenopus laevis[24, 34], the endocannabinoid-mediated modulation of fear, anxiety, and stress responses has also been postulated.

3. The Endocannabinoid System Is Involved in the Central Regulation of Teleost and Amphibian Reproductive Functions

The reproductive functions are regulated by the neuroendocrine system, so that a tight crosstalk between the hypothalamus, pituitary, and gonads takes place (Figure 1). In particular, the decapeptide GnRH is released from the hypothalamus and stimulates pituitary to release gonadotropins. FSH and LH act then at the gonadal levels, regulating spermatogenesis, oocyte growth, and steroidogenesis.

Figure 1: Schematic representation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis.

Cannabinoids exert potent negative effects upon both experimental animal and human reproduction, affecting gonadotropin synthesis and release, gonadic steroid production, spermatogenesis, ovulation, embryo development and implantation, sexual behaviour [6, 40, 41]. In vertebrates ECS modulates reproductive functions by acting at multiple levels (for a review, see [42]). Centrally, ECS negatively affects the secretion of pituitary gonadotropin hormones, by acting at the hypothalamic level. Also, a direct action on pituitary is possible, since AEA regulates in vitro pituitary hormone secretions in rat [43], and CB1 receptor has been found in mammalian pituitary anterior lobe [44] and in Xenopus laevisPRL and FSH cells [36]. The fact that CB1 receptors were detected in the Leydig cells of mouse testis and the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide (AEA) suppressed testosterone secretion by testes in normal but not in CB1 knockout mice [43] was the first evidence that cannabinoids do modulate reproductive functions also at the peripheral level. Recent data also point out a role for CB2 receptor, whose presence was observed in rat and human ovaries [45, 46], in human oocytes [47] and mouse spermatogonia [48]. In addition, endocannabinoids control sperm motility and/or acrosomic reaction [49–53], as well as ovulation, implantation, embryonic development, foetal growth, lactation (see the reviews [6, 54]). It is noteworthy that also in nonmammalian vertebrates basic components of the endocannabinoid system were found and characterized both in the brain and in the gonads. CB1 mRNA expression was in fact detected in the gonads of Carassius auratus and Pelvicachromis pulcher [55] and Sparus aurata [20] andDanio rerio [56], as well as Xenopus laevis [55]. In Rana esculenta the occurrence of both CB1 receptors and FAAH in the gonads was reported and CB1 levels have been shown to fluctuate during the annual sexual cycle [53], consistently with the observations in the brain [38, 39]. Also, the ECS inhibits male courtship clasping behaviour in the newt Taricha granulosa [23] and interferes with mammalian copulatory behaviour [6]. At the moment there are scarce or no available data regarding CB2 receptor in nonmammalian vertebrate gonads, with the exception of the teleost goldfish, where CB2 mRNA was found in testis and ovary [17].
At the central level, the action of the ECS on the hypothalamus has been first demonstrated by the observation that both exogenous and endogenous cannabinoids are responsible for the decrease of circulating LH and sexual steroids, by acting through a CB1-mediated inhibition of GnRH-I (formerly called mammalianGnRH) discharge (for a review, see [57]). The cannabinoid ligands might inhibit GnRH secreting neurons by activating specific signalling circuitries (e.g., GABA, dopamine, CRF, opioid) and inhibiting others (e.g., glutamate, norepinephrine). Moreover, since immortalized hypothalamic GnRH neurons are capable of releasing endogenous cannabinoids such as AEA and 2-AG and do possess CB1 and CB2 receptors [58], a direct neural control of GnRH-I release has been postulated (see Figure 2). Since GnRH is a key molecule in the gonadotropic regulation of all vertebrates, studies on the morphofunctional relationships between ECS and GnRH were conducted also in nonmammalian vertebrates. In particular, in Pelvicachromis pulcher, Carassius auratus, Solea solea, andDanio rerio, a close contiguity between CB1-immunostainings and GnRH-III- (previously calledsalmonGnRH) immununoreactive cell bodies and nerve fibers was observed in brain areas that are pivotal for the control of reproduction, such as the basal telencephalon, the preoptic area, and the hypothalamus ([16, 55, 59] and Cottone, unpublished data). Consistently, in Rana esculenta andXenopus laevis, the codistribution of CB1- and GnRH-I-immunoreactivity occurred in brain areas corresponding to those described in the above teleost species [37, 55]. In particular, a subset of frog GnRH-I-immunoreactive neurons in the septum and preoptic area, together with nerve fibres and terminals in the median eminence of the neurohypophysis, were found CB1-immunopositive [38]. Interestingly, during the frog annual sexual cycle, GnRH-I mRNA and CB1 levels have opposite expression profiles in the telencephalon and diencephalon [38, 60]. Also, anandamide is able to inhibit GnRH-I and GnRH-II synthesis and to affect GnRH receptors expression in the diencephalon, as well as in the testis; at the same time, a GnRH agonist inhibits the synthesis of GnRH-I mRNA and induces an increase in CB1 transcription [38, 61, 62], thus suggesting reciprocal relationships between the ECS and the GnRH system.

Figure 2: Schematic representation of direct and indirect effects of the ECS in the control of GnRH release (from [57]).

In line with dopaminergic control of fish reproduction through inhibition of both PRL release and gonadotropin (GTH-I and GTH-II) synthesis [63], CB1-immunoreactivities were found codistributed with TH- (the dopamine biosynthetic rate-limiting enzyme) immunopositive neurons and fibres in the basal telencephalon/preoptic area of Pelvicachromis pulcher and Carassius auratus [16]. Also, in the diencephalic paraventricular organ (PVO) of the goldfish a number of CB1-immunopositive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) contacting neurons were found closely adjacent to the TH-positive neurons that innervate the neurointermediate and the distal lobes of the teleost pituitary, thus indicating a CB1-mediated control of PVO dopaminergic neurons and, consequently, a direct or indirect regulation of pituitary activity [29].
Another molecule deeply involved in the reproductive physiology is aromatase (estrogen synthase), the enzyme that catalyzes the transformation of androgens into estrogens (for a review, see [64]). Aromatase is expressed both in gonads and brain; brain aromatase is essential for testosterone-mediated regulation of physiological and behavioural processes, such as sexual differentiation of the brain, activation of male sexual behaviour, and regulation of gonadotropic hormone secretion, as well as neurogenesis. Teleost fish do possess two aromatase genes, codifying for aromatase A, that is specifically expressed in the gonads, and aromatase B, that is strongly expressed in the brain. Indeed, teleosts, compared to other vertebrates, show remarkably high levels of brain aromatase activity and protein and gene expression, due to an autoregulatory loop through which estrogens and aromatizable androgens upregulate aromatase expression [65]. In zebrafish abundant aromatase-positive cells have been observed in the olfactory bulbs, telencephalon, preoptic area, and the hypothalamus, as well as in the thalamus, optic tectum, and around the fourth ventricle [66–68]. Interestingly, brain aromatase expression and activity fluctuate seasonally and with the reproductive state. Peculiarly, in teleosts brain aromatase is not expressed by neurons, as seen in mammals and birds. Instead, it is specifically expressed by radial glial cells [66], the cells that sustain the high neurogenic activity of adult fish; thus, in fish, aromatase is likely to be the key molecule enabling brain growth and brain sexualization throughout life. Given the role of aromatase in reproductive physiology, we evaluated the possible existence of a crosstalk between the ECS and brain aromatase, by analyzing the codistribution of CB1 cannabinoid receptors and aromatase in brain sections of both zebrafish and goldfish. In the preoptic area and periventricular grey of the hypothalamic inferior lobes, a tight contiguity between the two markers was indeed found (Figure 3 and data not shown), thus suggesting a CB1-mediated regulation of aromatase activity at least in bony fish.

Figure 3: Aromatase/CB1 immunoreactivities in the goldfish lateral recesses of the hypothalamus (depicted in the schematic draw of the goldfish brain, lateral view). (a), (b) and (c), (d): consecutive coronal sections showing in (a) and (c) a large number of aromatase-immunopositive radial glial cell processes codistributed with ((b) and (d), resp.) abundant CB1-immunopositive fibers and cell processes. Calibration bars: 100 μm. Cereb: cerebellum; hyp: hypothalamus; rhomb: rhombencephalon; tect: optic tectum of the mesencephalon; tel: telencephalon; vagal lobe: lobe of the X cranial nerve.

4. Concluding Remarks

The data reported in teleosts and amphibians strongly support the modulatory role of brain ECS on several neural circuits, including those involved in the control of reproductive functions.
Although the general physiological role of endocannabinoids is far from being understood in nonmammalian vertebrates, the investigations in organisms different from mammals might provide new insights into the cannabinoid biology. Basic information on the ECS derived from comparative investigations in invertebrates and/or anamniote vertebrates, besides bearing value for evolutionary and wildlife biological studies, could contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms of action of cannabinoid-related molecules and stimulate the development of new strategies for their therapeutic use in humans.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by PRIN 2010/2011 to Patrizia Bovolin. The authors wish to remember with this paper their mentor and colleague Maria Fosca Franzoni, who proficiently dedicated her life to the study of comparative neuroendocrinology.

References

1. V. Di Marzo and L. De Petrocellis, “Why do cannabinoid receptors have more than one endogenous ligand?” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 367, no. 1607, pp. 3216–3228, 2012.
2. M. R. Elphick and M. Egertová, “Cannabinoid receptor genetic and evolution,” in The Cannabinoid Receptors, P. H. Reggio, Ed., pp. 123–149, Humana Press, New Yark, NY, USA, 2009.
3. M. R. Elphick, “The evolution and comparative neurobiology of endocannabinoid signalling,”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 367, no. 1607, pp. 3201–3215, 2012.
4. V. Di Marzo, “The endocannabinoid system: its general strategy of action, tools for its pharmacological manipulation and potential therapeutic exploitation,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 77–84, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
5. B. Park, J. M. McPartland, and M. Glass, “Cannabis, cannabinoids and reproduction,”Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 189–197, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
6. H. Wang, S. K. Dey, and M. Maccarrone, “Jekyll and Hyde: two faces of cannabinoid signaling in male and female fertility,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 427–448, 2006. View at Publisher· View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
7. R. Chianese, T. Chioccarelli, G. Cacciola et al., “The contribution of lower vertebrate animal models in human reproduction research,” General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 17–27, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
8. W. A. Devane, F. A. Dysarz III, M. R. Johnson, L. S. Melvin, and A. C. Howlett, “Determination and characterization of a cannabinoid receptor in rat brain,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 605–613, 1988. View at Scopus
9. L. A. Matsuda, S. J. Lolait, M. J. Brownstein, A. C. Young, and T. I. Bonner, “Structure of a cannabinoid receptor and functional expression of the cloned cDNA,” Nature, vol. 346, no. 6284, pp. 561–564, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
10. F. Yamaguchi, A. D. Macrae, and S. Brenner, “Molecular cloning of two cannabinoid type 1-like receptor genes from the puffer fish Fugu rubripes,” Genomics, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 603–605, 1996.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
11. M. R. Elphick, “Evolution of cannabinoid receptors in vertebrates: identification of a CB2 gene in the puffer fish Fugu rubripes,” Biological Bulletin, vol. 202, no. 2, pp. 104–107, 2002. View at Scopus
12. O. Jatllon, J. Aury, F. Brunet et al., “Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridisreveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype,” Nature, vol. 431, no. 7011, pp. 946–957, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
13. C. S. Lam, S. Rastegar, and U. Strähle, “Distribution of cannabinoid receptor 1 in the CNS of zebrafish,” Neuroscience, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 83–95, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
14. I. Rodriguez-Martin, M. J. Herrero-Turrion, E. M. Velasco, R. Gonzalez-Sarmiento, and R. E. Rodriguez, “Characterization of two duplicate zebrafish Cb2-like cannabinoid receptors,” Gene, vol. 389, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
15. M. Valenti, E. Cottone, R. Martinez et al., “The endocannabinoid system in the brain of Carassius auratus and its possible role in the control of food intake,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 662–672, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
16. E. Cottone, E. Campantico, A. Guastalla, S. Aramu, A. M. Polzonetti-Magni, and M. Franzoni, “Are the cannabinoids involved in bony fish reproduction?” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1040, pp. 273–276, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
17. E. Cottone, V. Pomatto, F. Cerri et al., “Cannabinoid receptors are widely expressed in goldfish: molecular cloning of a CB2-like receptor and evaluation of CB1 and CB2 mRNA expression profiles in different organs,” Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. In press.
18. F. A. Palermo, B. Ruggeri, G. Mosconi, M. Virgili, and A. M. Polzonetti-Magni, “Partial cloning of CB1 cDNA and CB1 mRNA changes in stress responses in the Solea solea,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 286, no. 1-2, supplement 1, pp. S52–S59, 2008. View at Publisher ·View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
19. E. Cottone, S. Forno, E. Campantico et al., “Expression and distribution of CB1 cannabinoid receptors in the central nervous system of the African cichlid fish Pelvicachromis pulcher,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 485, no. 4, pp. 293–303, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
20. B. Ruggeri, L. Soverchia, G. Mosconi, M. F. Franzoni, E. Cottone, and A. M. Polzonetti-Magni, “Changes of gonadal CB1 cannabinoid receptor mRNA in the gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata, during sex reversal,” General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 263–269, 2007.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
21. E. Harvey-Girard, A. C. Giassi, W. Ellis, and L. Maler, “Expression of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor in the gymnotiform fish brain and its implications for the organization of the teleost pallium,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 521, no. 4, pp. 949–975, 2013.
22. G. J. Roch, S. Wu, and N. M. Sherwood, “Hormones and receptors in fish: do duplicates matter?”General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
23. K. Soderstrom, M. Leid, F. L. Moore, and T. F. Murray, “Behavioral, pharmacological, and molecular characterization of an amphibian cannabinoid receptor,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 413–423, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
24. E. Cottone, C. Salio, M. Conrath, and M. F. Franzoni, “Xenopus laevis CB1 cannabinoid receptor: molecular cloning and mRNA distribution in the central nervous system,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 464, no. 4, pp. 487–496, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
25. R. Meccariello, R. Chianese, G. Cobellis, R. Pierantoni, and S. Fasano, “Cloning of type 1 cannabinoid receptor in Rana esculenta reveals differences between genomic sequence and cDNA,” FEBS Journal, vol. 274, no. 11, pp. 2909–2920, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
26. L. S. Demski, “Feeding and aggressive behavior evoked by hypothalamic stimulation in a cichlid fish,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, vol. 44, pp. 685–692, 1973. View at Scopus
27. M. G. Roberts and G. E. Savage, “Effects of hypothalamic lesions on the food intake of the goldfish (Carassius auratus),” Brain, Behavior and Evolution, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 150–164, 1978.View at Scopus
28. L. S. Demski and R. G. Northcutt, “The terminal nerve: a new chemosensory system in vertebrates?” Science, vol. 220, no. 4595, pp. 435–437, 1983. View at Scopus
29. E. Cottone, D. Donna, A. Guastalla, E. Campantico, A. Polzonetti-Magni, and M. F. Franzoni, “The cannabinoid signaling system: comparative biology of an old neuromodulatory system,” inEvolutionary Molecular Strategies and Plasticity, M. Canonaco and R. M. Facciolo, Eds., pp. 73–93, Research Signpost, Kerala, India, 2007.
30. V. Pomatto, E. Cottone, and P. Bovolin, “Influence of the endocannabinoid system on teleost neurogenesis: new insights from goldfish,” Submitted.
31. T. Harkany, E. Keimpema, K. Barabás, and J. Mulder, “Endocannabinoid functions controlling neuronal specification during brain development,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 286, no. 1-2, supplement 1, pp. S84–S90, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
32. D. M. Hollis, E. J. Coddington, and F. L. Moore, “Neuroanatomical distribution of cannabinoid receptor gene expression in the brain of the rough-skinned newt, Taricha granulosa,” Brain, Behavior and Evolution, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 135–149, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
33. B. Migliarini, G. Marucci, F. Ghelfi, and O. Carnevali, “Endocannabinoid system in Xenopus laevis development: CB1 receptor dynamics,” FEBS Letters, vol. 580, no. 8, pp. 1941–1945, 2006.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
34. R. Cesa, K. Mackie, M. Beltramo, and M. Franzoni, “Cannabinoid receptor CB1-like and glutamic acid decarboxylase-like immunoreactivities in the brain of Xenopus laevis,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 306, no. 3, pp. 391–398, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
35. C. Salio, E. Cottone, M. Conrath, and M. F. Franzoni, “CB1 cannabinoid receptors in amphibian spinal cord: relationships with some nociception markers,” Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 153–162, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
36. R. Cesa, A. Guastalla, E. Cottone, K. Mackie, M. Beltramo, and M. F. Franzoni, “Relationships between CB1 cannabinoid receptors and pituitary endocrine cells in Xenopus laevis: an immunohistochemical study,” General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
37. D. Donna, E. Cottone, S. Aramu, E. Campantico, A. Guastalla, and M. F. Franzoni, “Endocannabinoids and amphibian reproduction: an immunohistochemical study in the green frog,” Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, vol. 140, pp. 37–45, 2006.
38. R. Meccariello, M. F. Franzoni, R. Chianese et al., “Interplay between the endocannabinoid system and GnRH-I in the forebrain of the anuran amphibian Rana esculenta,” Endocrinology, vol. 149, no. 5, pp. 2149–2158, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
39. R. Meccariello, R. Chianese, G. Cacciola, G. Cobellis, R. Pierantoni, and S. Fasano, “Type-1 cannabinoid receptor expression in the frog, Rana esculenta, tissues: a possible involvement in the regulation of testicular activity,” Molecular Reproduction and Development, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 551–558, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
40. L. L. Murphy, R. M. Muñoz, B. A. Adrian, and M. A. Villanúa, “Function of cannabinoid receptors in the neuroendocrine regulation of hormone secretion,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 5, no. 6, part B, pp. 432–446, 1998.
41. U. Pagotto, G. Marsicano, D. Cota, B. Lutz, and R. Pasquali, “The emerging role of the endocannabinoid system in endocrine regulation and energy balance,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 73–100, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
42. G. Cacciola, R. Chianese, T. Chioccarelli et al., “Cannabinoids and reproduction: a lasting and intriguing history,” Pharmaceuticals, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 3275–3323, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
43. T. Wenger, C. Ledent, V. Csernus, and I. Gerendai, “The central cannabinoid receptor inactivation suppresses endocrine reproductive functions,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 284, no. 2, pp. 363–368, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar ·View at Scopus
44. T. Wenger, J. J. Fernández-Ruizz.ast, and J. A. Ramos, “Immunocytochemical demonstration of CB1 cannabinoid receptors in the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland,” Journal of Neuroendocrinology, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 873–878, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
45. P. Bagavandoss and S. Grimshaw, “Temporal and spatial distribution of the cannabinoid receptors (CB 1, CB2) and fatty acid amide hydroxylase in the rat ovary,” Anatomical Record, vol. 293, no. 8, pp. 1425–1432, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
46. M. R. El-Talatini, A. H. Taylor, J. C. Elson, L. Brown, A. C. Davidson, and J. C. Konje, “Localisation and function of the endocannabinoid system in the human ovary,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 2, Article ID e4579, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
47. L. Peralta, E. Agirregoitia, R. Mendoza et al., “Expression and localization of cannabinoid receptors in human immature oocytes and unfertilized metaphase-II oocytes,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 372–379, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar· View at Scopus
48. P. Grimaldi, P. Orlando, S. Di Siena et al., “The endocannabinoid system and pivotal role of the CB2 receptor in mouse spermatogenesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 27, pp. 11131–11136, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
49. H. Schuel, L. J. Burkman, J. Lippes et al., “Evidence that anandamide-signaling regulates human sperm functions required for fertilization,” Molecular Reproduction and Development, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 376–387, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
50. M. Maccarrone, B. Barboni, A. Paradisi et al., “Characterization of the endocannabinoid system in boar spermatozoa and implications for sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 118, part 19, pp. 4393–4404, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
51. M. Rossato, F. I. Popa, M. Ferigo, G. Clari, and C. Foresta, “Human sperm express cannabinoid receptor Cb1, the activation of which inhibits motility, acrosome reaction, and mitochondrial function,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 984–991, 2005.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
52. G. Ricci, G. Cacciola, L. Altucci et al., “Endocannabinoid control of sperm motility: the role of epididymus,” General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 153, no. 1–3, pp. 320–322, 2007.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
53. G. Cobellis, G. Cacciola, D. Scarpa et al., “Endocannabinoid system in frog and rodent testis: type-1 cannabinoid receptor and fatty acid amide hydrolase activity in male germ cells,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 82–89, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
54. N. Battista, R. Meccariello, G. Cobellis et al., “The role of endocannabinoids in gonadal function and fertility along the evolutionary axis,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 355, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
55. E. Cottone, A. Guastalla, K. Mackie, and M. F. Franzoni, “Endocannabinoids affect the reproductive functions in teleosts and amphibians,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 286, no. 1-2, supplement 1, pp. S41–S45, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
56. B. Migliarini and O. Carnevali, “A novel role for the endocannabinoid system during zebrafish development,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 299, no. 2, pp. 172–177, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
57. R. Pierantoni, G. Cobellis, R. Meccariello et al., “Chapter 14 CB1 activity in male reproduction: mammalian and nonmammalian animal models,” Vitamins and Hormones, vol. 81, pp. 367–387, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
58. C. M. Gammon, G. M. Freeman Jr., W. Xie, S. L. Petersen, and W. C. Wetsel, “Regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion by cannabinoids,” Endocrinology, vol. 146, no. 10, pp. 4491–4499, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
59. G. Cardinaletti, M. F. Franzoni, F. A. Palermo et al., “Enrironmental and neuroendocrine control of fish reproduction,” in Recent Advances in Fish Reproduction Biology, A. Garcia-Ayala, J. M. Penalver, and E. Chavez-Pozo, Eds., pp. 65–87, Research Signpost, Kerala, India, 2010.
60. R. Chianese, G. Cobellis, R. Pierantoni, S. Fasano, and R. Meccariello, “Non-mammalian vertebrate models and the endocannabinoid system: relationships with gonadotropin-releasing hormone,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 286, no. 1-2, supplement 1, pp. S46–S51, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
61. R. Chianese, V. Ciaramella, S. Fasano, R. Pierantoni, and R. Meccariello, “Anandamide modulates the expression of GnRH-II and GnRHRs in frog, Rana esculenta, diencephalon,” General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 173, no. 3, pp. 389–395, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
62. R. Chianese, V. Ciaramella, D. Scarpa, S. Fasano, R. Pierantoni, and R. Meccariello, “Anandamide regulates the expression of GnRH1, GnRH2, and GnRH-Rs in frog testis,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 303, no. 4, pp. E475–E487, 2012.
63. B. Levavi-Sivan, M. Ofir, and Z. Yaron, “Possible sites of dopaminergic inhibition of gonadotropin release from the pituitary of a teleost fish, tilapia,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 87–95, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
64. Y. Le Page, N. Diotel, C. Vaillant et al., “Aromatase, brain sexualization and plasticity: the fish paradigm,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 2105–2115, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
65. V. Pomatto, F. Palermo, G. Mosconi et al., “Xenoestrogens elicit a modulation of endocannabinoid system and estrogen receptors in 4NP treated goldfish, Carassius auratus,”General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 174, no. 1, pp. 30–35, 2011. View at Publisher ·View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
66. N. Diotel, J. L. Do Rego, I. Anglade et al., “The brain of teleost fish, a source, and a target of sexual steroids,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 5, article 137, 2011.
67. P. M. Forlano, D. L. Deitcher, D. A. Myers, and A. H. Bass, “Anatomical distribution and cellular basis for high levels of aromatase activity in the brain of teleost fish: aromatase enzyme and mRNA expression identify glia as source,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 8943–8955, 2001. View at Scopus
68. A. Menuet, E. Pellegrini, F. Brion et al., “Expression and estrogen-dependent regulation of the zebrafish brain aromatase gene,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 485, no. 4, pp. 304–320, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus