Skip to main content
Canna~Fangled Abstracts

WIN 55,212-2, Agonist of Cannabinoid Receptors, Prevents Amyloid β1-42 Effects on Astrocytes in Primary Culture.

By April 13, 2015No Comments
Icon for Public Library of Science
PLOS

  • Published: April 13, 2015
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122843

Abstract

plos

Alzheimer´s disease (AD), a neurodegenerative illness involving synaptic dysfunction with extracellular accumulation of Aβ1-42 toxic peptide, glial activation, inflammatory response and oxidative stress, can lead to neuronal death. Endogenous cannabinoid system is implicated in physiological and physiopathological events in central nervous system (CNS), and changes in this system are related to many human diseases, including AD. However, studies on the effects of cannabinoids on astrocytes functions are scarce. In primary cultured astrocytes we studied cellular viability using MTT assay. Inflammatory and oxidative stress mediators were determined by ELISA and Western-blot techniques both in the presence and absence of Aβ1-42peptide. Effects of WIN 55,212-2 (a synthetic cannabinoid) on cell viability, inflammatory mediators and oxidative stress were also determined. Aβ1-42 diminished astrocytes viability, increased TNF-α and IL-1β levels and p-65, COX-2 and iNOS protein expression while decreased PPAR-γ and antioxidant enzyme Cu/Zn SOD. WIN 55,212-2 pretreatment prevents all effects elicited by Aβ1-42. Furthermore, cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 also increased cell viability and PPAR-γ expression in control astrocytes. In conclusion cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 increases cell viability and anti-inflammatory response in cultured astrocytes. Moreover, WIN 55,212-2 increases expression of anti-oxidant Cu/Zn SOD and is able to prevent inflammation induced by Aβ1-42 in cultured astrocytes. Further studies would be needed to assess the possible beneficial effects of cannabinoids in Alzheimer’s disease patients.

Introduction


PLOS
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a common neurodegenerative disease implicated in the aging process, affecting nearly 50% of people over 75 [1,2]. It involves neurofibrillary degeneration, extracellular accumulation of beta-amyloid peptide (Aβ) and synaptic dysfunction, resulting in neural cell death in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex, and in activation of glial cells [3,4]. Aβ can interact with different cellular components producing Ca2+ deregulation, oxidative stress and inflammation [5,6].

 
Astrocytes are specialized neural cells serving as a structural and metabolic support and trophic help to the brain [7]. Astrocytes also release cytokines and chemokines involved both in protective and toxic roles in neuroinflammatory processes [8]. However, released cytokines in neuroinflammation may induce deleterious effects on the viability and functionality of astrocytes [9]. Furthermore, in pathological situations such as hypoxia, cytokines induce activation of vascular endothelial cells thereby modulating inflammatory responses [10]. In AD, astrocytes are found around senile plaques producing phagocytosis, and cleaning up toxic compounds such as Aβ [11]. Moreover, when stimulated with compounds such as genistein or estradiol, astrocytes block the release of pro-inflammatory mediators and induce the synthesis of anti-inflammatory proteins [12].
Endocannabinoids have been implicated in various physiopathological events in different organs, including the peripheral and central nervous system (CNS) [13], and changes in the endocannabinoid system have been related to many human diseases, such as metabolic syndrome [14], neurodegeneration [15], inflammatory diseases [16], psychiatric disorders [17] and cancer [18]. The endocannabinoid signaling system is composed of anandamide and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol interacting with CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors. Receptor signaling may involve mechanisms such as adenylyl cyclase blockade or activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases or ceramide signaling [13].
Different authors have proposed cannabinoids as preventive treatment in AD [19] due to their anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties [16]. In this sense, cannabinoids prevented microglial activation and cognitive impairment in Aβ-treated rats [19]. In mice exposed to Aβ, cannabinoids also suppress neuroinflammation by inhibiting inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression and interleukin-1β generation [20]. However, the effects of cannabinoids on astrocytes functions have been poorly investigated. Therefore, we investigated the role of WIN 55,212–2 (WIN) as a neuroprotective agent against lesions induced by Aβ1–42 on cultured astrocytes.

Material and Methods

Materials

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were obtained from Gibco (Gibco Invitrogen Corporation, Barcelona, Spain). The oligomers Aβ (40–1 and 1–42), were prepared following manufacture instructions (Sigma-Aldrich biotechnology). Briefly, the peptides were dissolved in H2O, and, for assembly the oligomers, preparations were heated for 24 h at 37ºC. WIN and 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-dipheni​yl-2H-tetrazoliumbromide (MTT) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St Louis, MO). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for interleukin 1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) from Pierce Biotechnology, Inc. (Rockford, USA). Western Blot Chemiluminescent Detection System (ECL) was from Amersham (Amersham Biosciences, Barcelona, Spain). Monoclonal anti-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor antibody (PPAR-γ) (1:250) and polyclonal anti-cyclooxigenase-2 antibody (COX-2) (1:250) from Sigma Aldrich (Madrid, Spain). Monoclonal p65 antibody (p65) (1:250) and monoclonal anti-Mn superoxide dismutase antibody (Mn-SOD) (1:250) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Madrid, Spain). Polyclonal anti-Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase antibody (Cu/Zn SOD) (1:250) from Assay Designs (Madrid, Spain). Monoclonal inducible nitric oxide synthetize (iNOS) (1:250) and anti-tubuline (1:1000) antibodies from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA, USA). All other reagents are analytical or culture grade purity.

Primary culture of cortical astrocytes

All animals were handled according to the recommendations of the Bioethics Committee of the School of Medicine of the University of Valencia, Spain. Ethics committee specifically approved this study. Cortical astrocytes were isolated from rat fetuses of 21 days gestation. Fetuses were obtained by cesarean section and decapitated. Cerebral cortices were removed and triturated 10–15 times through a Pasteur pipette with 10 ml DMEM. The cell suspension was filtered through nylon mesh with a pore size of 90 μm and re-suspended in DMEM containing 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS), supplemented with L-glutamine (1%), HEPES (10 mM), fungizone (1%), and antibiotics (1%). Cells were plated on T75 culture flask and maintained in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air at 37°C during 15 days. After 4 days of culture, the FBS was maintained at 20% and after 1 week of culture, the FBS content was reduced to 10%, and the medium was changed twice a week. The purity of astrocytes was assessed by immunofluorescence using anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (astrocyte marker; Sigma-Aldrich), anti-CD-68 (microglial marker; Serotec), anti-myelin basic protein (olygodendroglial marker; Sigma-Aldrich) and anti-microtubule-associated protein 2 (neuronal marker; Sigma-Aldrich). The astrocyte cultures were found to be at least 99% glial fibrillary acidic protein positive. No cells were found to express CD-68, myelin basic protein, or microtubule-associated protein-2.

Cell treatments

Ten days after seeding, WIN (10 μM) was added to culture flasks. Twenty-four hours later, 10 μM Aβ1–42 (toxic peptide) or Aβ40–1 (control peptide) (Sigma-Aldrich) were added to the flasks. Aβ1–42 concentration used in our study is in the range of toxic concentrations of the peptide [21,22]. Before incubation, the peptides were diluted in 100 μM of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated for 24 h at 37º C. Assays were performed 24 h after peptide addition.

MTT assay

Cell viability was determined by MTT assay. The MTT assay is a well-established, widely used and easily reproducible method for the assessment of cell viability and cytotoxicity [23,24]. Astrocytes were plated in 96-well culture plate and incubated with WIN during 24h. Subsequently, Aβ40–1 (control) and Aβ1–42 peptides were added to wells for another 24h. After cell treatments, the medium was removed and cells were incubated with red free medium and MTT solution [0.5 mg/ml, prepared in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) solution] for 4 h at 37ºC. Finally, the medium was removed and formazan particles were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide. Cell viability, defined as the relative amount of MTT reduction, was determined by spectrophotometry at 570 nm.

Cytokine determination, IL-1 and TNFα

Astrocytes were seeded as previously published [12]. At the time of assay, the red phenol medium was removed and replaced by PBS containing 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, either in the presence or absence of Aβ1–42 (10 μM). IL-1β and TNF-α concentration (pg/ml) were ascertained using ELISA kits (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc.).

Western blot analysis

Cultured cells were treated with lysis buffer and mechanically degraded to release the proteins. Protein concentration was determined using modified Lowry method [25]. Loading buffer (0.125 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 0.5% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol, 1% bromophenolblue and 19% glycerol) was added to protein sample and heated for 5 min at 95ºC. Proteins were separated on SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes in a humid environment using a transfer buffer (25mM Tris, 190mM glycine, 20% methanol). Membranes were blocked with 5% milk in TBS-T (0.05% Tween-20) and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4ºC. Membranes were washed 3 times with wash buffer TBS-T and incubated with a secondary anti-rabbit IgG or anti-mouse IgG (Cell Signalling Technologies Danvers, MA) antibody conjugated to the enzyme horseradish peroxidase (HRP) for 1 h. Membranes were washed three times and proteins were detected using the ECL method as specified by the manufacturer. Autoradiography signals were assessed using digital image system ImageQuant LAS 4000 (GE Healthcare).

Statistical analyses

Values are expressed as mean±S.D. Differences between groups were assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical significance was accepted at P ≤ 0.05. Data sets in which F was significant were examined by a modified t-test.

Results

Protective role of WIN on cell viability

The role of WIN on cell viability was studied using MTT conversion assay. Fig 1A shows that incubation with WIN at different concentrations induced a significant increase in cell viability at 10 μM. Consequently, that concentration was used in future experiments. Astrocytes previously incubated with 10 μM Aβ1–42 for 24 h significantly decreased cell viability compared to control cells (Fig 1B). Furthermore, pretreating astrocytes during 48 h with WIN (10 μM) prevented the decrease in cell viability induced by Aβ1–42 (WIN + Aβ), conversely WIN (1, 2, 5μM) did not have any effect (Fig 1B).

thumbnail

Fig 1. Astrocytes viability.

(A) Astrocytes viability induced by WIN. Concentration-dependent viability of WIN (1, 2, 5, 10 μM) was determined by MTT assay for 24 h. Data are means ± SD for 4 independent experiments. *p<0.04 comparing WIN vs control cells. (B) Astrocytes viability in cells treated during 24 h with 10 μM Aβ40–1 (control peptide, C), 10 μM Aβ1–42 (Aβ) and WIN (1, 2, 5, 10 μM) + 10 μM Aβ1–42 (WIN + Aβ). Data are means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. *p<0.05 vs control cells.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122843.g001

WIN prevents IL-1β and TNF-α increase elicited by Aβ1–42

Cultured astrocytes were incubated with 10 μM Aβ1–42 and proinflammatory mediators TNF-α and IL-1β were detected by ELISA. Aβ1–42 increased 4.5-fold IL-1β release (480.4±150.3 pg/ml) compared with control (103.9±82.9 pg/ml) (Fig 2A) and 2.4 fold TNF-α release (605.3±103.4 pg/ml vs 210.5±85.3 pg/ml in control group) (Fig 2B). Furthermore, WIN pre-treatment (10 μM) prevented the increase in pro-inflammatory mediators induced by Aβ1–42(Fig 2A and 2B).

thumbnail

Fig 2. IL-1β and TNF-α secretion.

WIN prevents the increase of IL-1β and TNF-α secretion caused by Aβ1–42 in astrocytes. Cells were incubated with 10 μM Aβ40–1 (control peptide, C), 10 μM Aβ1–42(Aβ), 10 μM WIN + 10 μM control peptide (WIN) and 10 μM WIN + 10 μM Aβ1–42 (WIN + Aβ). Cell culture supernatants were harvested, and IL-1β (panel A) and TNF-α (panel B) secretion were determined by ELISA. Values are means ± SD of replicate experiments from 4 independent astrocytes cultures. *p<0.05 vs control astrocytes. #p<0.05 vs Aβ1–42 treated cells.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122843.g002

Effect of Aβ1–42 and WIN on p65 protein expression

Nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), the pro-inflammatory transcription factor is formed by different subunits. We measured p65 protein expression by western-blot. Incubation with Aβ1–42increased p65 protein expression compared with control astrocytes (Fig 3), which was prevented by WIN pretreatment. (p<0.05 compared with Aβ1–42 treated astrocytes).

thumbnail

Fig 3. p65 protein expression.

WIN 55, 212–2 prevents p65 expression induced by Aβ1–42 in astrocytes in primary culture. p65 and α-tubulin expressions were determined by Western-blot in astrocytes treated for 24 h with 10 μM Aβ40–1 (control peptide, C), 10 μM Aβ1–42 (Aβ), 10 μM WIN + 10 µM control peptide (WIN) and 10 μM WIN + 10 μM Aβ1–42 (WIN + Aβ). A representative immunoblot of each protein is shown and tubulin was used as control amount of protein. Data are means ± SD of 5 independent experiments. *p<0.05 vscontrol cells. #p<0.05 vs Aβ1–42.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122843.g003

WIN prevents COX-2 and iNOS protein increase induced by Aβ1–42peptide

Incubation with Aβ1–42 significantly increased inflammatory proteins COX-2 (Fig 4A) and iNOS (Fig 4B) expressions compared to control. Furthermore, pretreating astrocytes with WIN prevented the effects produced by Aβ1–42.

thumbnail

Fig 4. COX-2 and iNOS protein expression.

WIN prevents COX-2 and iNOS expression induced by Aβ1–42. COX-2 (panel A), iNOS (panel B) and α-tubulin expressions were determined by Western-blot in astrocytes treated for 24 h with 10 μM Aβ40–1 (control peptide, C), 10 μM Aβ1–42 (Aβ), 10 μM WIN + 10 μM control peptide (WIN) and 10 μM WIN + 10 μM Aβ1–42 (WIN + Aβ). A representative immunoblot of each protein is shown and tubulin was used as control amount of protein. Data are means ± SD of 6 independent experiments. *p<0.05 vscontrol cells. #p<0.05 vs Aβ1–42.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122843.g004

Effect of Aβ1–42 and WIN on PPAR-γ protein expression

Pro-inflammatory gene expression is downregulated by PPARs family [26]. We found that pretreatment with WIN (10 μM) increased PPAR-γ expression compared to control cells (Fig 5). Incubation with Aβ1–42 significantly decreased PPAR-γ expression that was prevented by WIN pretreatment.

thumbnail

Fig 5. PPAR-γ protein expression.

WIN induces PPAR-γ expression in astrocytes in primary culture treated with Aβ1–42. PPAR-γ and α-tubulin expressions were determined by Western-blot in astrocytes treated for 24 h with 10 μM Aβ40–1 (control peptide, C), 10 μM Aβ1–42 (Aβ), 10 μM WIN + 10 μM control peptide (WIN) and 10 μM WIN + 10 μM Aβ1–42 (WIN + Aβ). A representative immunoblot of each protein is shown and tubulin was used as control amount of protein. Data are means ± SD of 4 independent experiments. *p<0.05 vscontrol cells. #p<0.05 vs Aβ1–42.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122843.g005

Effect of Aβ1–42 and WIN on Cu/Zn SOD and Mn SOD protein expression

Superoxide dismutase is a key antioxidant enzyme. In our study, incubation with Aβ1–42decreased Cu/Zn SOD expression in astrocytes in primary culture which was prevented by WIN pretreatment, evidencing that WIN could play a neuro-protective role against oxidative stress induced by Aβ1–42 peptide (Fig 6A). On the other hand, our results indicated that Mn SOD protein expression is increased in presence of Aβ1–42. Pretreatment with WIN did not prevent Mn SOD increase induced by Aβ1–42 (Fig 6B).

thumbnail

Fig 6. Cu/Zn-SOD and Mn-SOD protein expressions.

WIN prevents Cu/Zn-SOD expression decrease in astrocytes in primary culture treated with Aβ1–42. Cu/Zn-SOD, Mn-SOD and α-tubulin expressions were determined by Western-blot in astrocytes treated for 24 h with 10 μM Aβ40–1 (control peptide, C), 10 μM Aβ1–42 (Aβ), 10 μM WIN + 10 μM control peptide (WIN) and 10 μM WIN + 10 μM Aβ1–42 (WIN + Aβ). A representative immunoblot of each protein is shown and tubulin was used as control amount of protein. Data are means ± SD of 4 independent experiments. *p<0.05 vs control cells. #p<0.05 vs Aβ1–42.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122843.g006

Discussion

Oxidative stress and inflammation are the main mechanisms in the progression of various neurodegenerative diseases, including AD [2730]. In our study, we determined different markers involved in inflammation and oxidative stress induced by the Aβ1–42 peptide in primary cultures of astrocytes, with the aim to assess the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of cannabinoid WIN. We found that WIN significantly increased astrocytes viability compared to control cells. Furthermore, WIN prevented the decrease in astrocytes viability induced by Aβ1–42.
It has been shown that cannabinoids preserve neurons from Aβ exposure by activating MAP kinase cascade [31] and by anti-oxidative and anti-apoptotic effects [32]. Moreover, some studies demonstrated that cannabinoids protect glial cells from death [33,34]. Nevertheless, in cancer, where cells are highly proliferative and undifferentiated, treatment with cannabinoids can block cell proliferation in a dose dependent manner [3538], demonstrating that the effects of cannabinoids on cell viability are probably dependent on cell type [39] and developmental stage [40].
Expression of CB1 [41] and CB2 [42] receptors in rat culture astrocytes have been published and also dual activation of both cannabinoid receptors by WIN (the mixed non-selective CB1/CB2 agonist) in rat cortical astrocytes have been detected [41] On the other hand, WIN confers its protective and anti-inflammatory effects against Aβ injury through both CB1 and CB2 receptors [43]. Given that our results there is expression of both types of cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, it is likely that the effect of WIN observed in our study is due to the interaction with both types of receptors, consistent with published results by Fakhfouri and cols [44].
We found that WIN prevented the increase of inflammatory mediators IL-1β, TNF-α, NF-κB, iNOS and COX-2, as well as the decrease of the anti-inflammatory mediator PPAR-γ induced by Aβ1–42 in astrocytes in primary culture. The inflammatory process is a characteristic mechanism in the development of AD, and pro-inflammatory agents are involved in the progression of cell damage [45,46,47,12]. Moreover, it is known that astrocytes participate in the inflammatory process induced by Aβ1–42 [27,28,48]. Initially, inflammation is beneficial since it produces pro-inflammatory substances involved in tissue protection, limiting the survival and proliferation of cells exposed to toxic agents, such as Aβ1–42 [49,50]. However, sustained inflammatory response could lead to neurotoxic damage or cell death [12,51,8]. NF-κB proteins are up-regulated in inflammation conditions such as astroglial activation induced by Aβ1–42oligomers [52]. In this regard, we found an increase in NF-kB/p-65 expression in astrocytes after addition of Aβ1–42 that was prevented by WIN pretreatment. Valles and collaborators [53] found that the cytokine-receptor complex is able to bind to cytokines and other proteins of the extracellular matrix, producing inflammatory signals which could be important in pathologies such as Alzheimer’s disease [53,54]. In agreement with our results, different authors have reported that cannabinoids mitigate neural cell activation in the neuroinflammatory response induced by Aβ1–42, reducing the levels of pro-inflammatory molecules such as IL-1β, TNF-α, COX-2 and iNOS [55,56,57]. Likewise, the activation of cannabinoid receptors diminishes the release of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α in microglial cells [58,59,60] as well as COX-2 and iNOS [61]. Studies conducted in rats pretreated with the Aβ peptide found that WIN prevented cognitive impairment, glial activation and neuronal loss [19,62,63], and also reduced COX-2, iNOS and TNF-α levels [63,64].
Kainu et al. [65] demonstrated for the first time the presence of mRNA and protein PPAR-γ in CNS cells. Subsequent studies have detected PPAR-γ expression in microglial and astrocytic cells [66,12]. PPAR-γ agonists protect against Aβ-induced inflammatory and neuronal damage [67,68], thus making neurons and astrocytes potential therapeutic targets for PPAR-γ ligands [69,12]. Astrocytes also express the largest levels of PPAR-γ in the neural tissues [70,71]. As other authors [72,73,74], we found a decreased expression of PPAR-γ in astrocytes treated with Aβ1–42. Esposito et al. [56] showed in neurons that cannabinoids may act as neuro-protective agents by PPAR-γ activation. In this study, we demonstrate an increase in this protein expression in astrocytic cells previously incubated with WIN. Furthermore, we found for the first time that WIN prevents PPAR-γ expression decrease induced by Aβ1–42 peptide in astrocytes in primary culture. There is strong evidence to suggest that some cannabinoids can act on PPARs through either direct or indirect pathways. In order to directly act on nuclear transcriptional factors PPARs, exogenous cannabinoids need to pass through plasma membrane and be transported into nucleus which may involve certain membrane and intracellular transporters. However, we still cannot rule out that cannabinoids effects could be indirect through the binding of other cellular targets which in turn induces PPARs activation [75]. In fact, WIN attenuates amyloid-beta-induced neuroinflammation in rats through activation of cannabinoid receptors and PPAR-γ pathway [44].
Different authors have demonstrated the role of oxidative stress in AD [7679]. The cumulative damage caused by free radicals induces alterations in the activity or expression of antioxidant enzymes like catalase or SOD. These enzymes were found to be decreased in both CNS and peripheral tissues of AD patients [80,81]. In this sense, we demonstrate that Cu/Zn SOD is decreased in astrocytes treated with Aβ1–42. Our results are consistent with those reported by other authors, highlighting the role of oxidative stress in the development of AD [82]. New substances are under research to reduce damage caused by oxidative stress in this disease. Widely distributed in the body, cannabinoids receptors were discovered few decades ago and are still under research [57]. Few studies address the effect of cannabinoids on oxidative stress. For instance, cannabinoids were found to prevent or antagonize oxidative stress toxicity in cortical neurons in cultures [83,84], and in lymphoblastic cells [85]. Studies with PC12 cells exposed to Aβ1–42 peptide demonstrated that cannabinoids reduced reactive oxygen species production and membrane lipid oxidation [86,32]. Our results provide evidence that Aβ1–42decreases Cu/Zn SOD expression in astrocytes in primary culture, and pretreatment with WIN increases Cu/Zn SOD expression, preventing the decrease caused by Aβ1–42. These findings indicate that cannabinoids could act as a protective agent against oxidative stress caused by Aβ1–42. In Fig 7 the set of results are summarized. However our results indicate that Aβ1–42elevated Mn SOD protein expression, increasing mitochondrial biogenesis mechanism, such as we previously published [74]. Pretreatment with WIN did not prevent Mn SOD overexpression induced by Aβ1–42. Mn SOD plays a role in the adaptive response which protects brain cells from damage, as in the case of AD. In fact, Mn SOD preserves neurons against oxidative stress [87] and protects developing neurons from β-amyloid toxicity [88]. This enzyme catalyzes the conversion of superoxide radicals to molecular oxygen and H2O2, whereas glutathione peroxidase, peroxiredoxin reductase and catalase neutralize H2O2. Overexpression of Mn SOD induces cognitive recovery and reduces Aβ levels in AD animal models [89]. Furthermore, Mn SOD deficiency increases β-amyloid levels and amyloid plaque burden, promoting the development of behavioural disturbances [90].

thumbnail

Fig 7. Preventive function of cannabinoid WIN on Aβ1-42-induced toxic effects in astrocytes in primary culture.

Cannabinoid WIN 55,212–2 increases cell viability and anti-inflammatory response in cultured astrocytes and prevents inflammatory effects induced by Aβ1–42.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122843.g007

Preclinical data suggest a beneficial role of some cannabinoids for treatment of different diseases. Dronabidol, an oil-based solution of Δ9-THC, is used as anti-emetic and appetite stimulant [91]. Δ9-THC also decreases agitation present in the advanced stage of AD [92]. In 2003, the FDA granted the patent for cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuro-protectants (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). Despite these promising preliminary results, the clinical utility of cannabinoids in AD is still to be determined [93].

Conclusions

Taken together, our findings show that cannabinoid WIN increases cell viability and anti-inflammatory response in astrocytes in primary culture and prevents cell death induced by Aβ1–42. Furthermore, WIN increases expression of anti-oxidant Cu/Zn SOD and is able to prevent inflammation induced by Aβ1–42 in astrocytes. In this sense, clinical studies are needed to evaluate the neuro-protective effects of cannabinoids in Alzheimer´s disease.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SLV MA. Performed the experiments: DAR SGO MDM EO. Analyzed the data: AI JMV. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: PM. Wrote the paper: SLV MA.

References

  1. 1.Selkoe DJ. Alzheimer’s disease: genotypes, phenotypes, and treatments. Science. 1977;275: 630–631. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5300.630
  2. 2.Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, Brodaty H, Fratiglioni L, Ganguli M, et al. Alzheimer’s Disease International. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet. 2005;366: 2112–2117. pmid:16360788 doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67889-0
  3. 3.Heneka MT, O’Banion MK. Inflammatory processes in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroimmunol. 2007;184: 69–91. pmid:17222916 doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.11.017
  4. 4.Pratico D. Evidence of oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease brain and antioxidant therapy: lights and shadows. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1147: 70–78. doi: 10.1196/annals.1427.010. pmid:19076432
  5. 5.Inestrosa NC, Reyes AE, Chacón MA, Cerpa W, Villalón A, Montiel J, et al. Human-like rodent amyloid-beta-peptide determines Alzheimer pathology in aged wild-type Octodon degu. Neurobiol Aging. 2005;26: 1023–1028. pmid:15748782 doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.09.016
  6. 6.Vallés SL, Borrás C, Gambini J, Furriol J, Ortega A, Sastre J, et al. Oestradiol or genistein rescues neurons from amyloid beta-induced cell death by inhibiting activation of p38. Aging Cell. 2008;7: 112–118. pmid:18031570 doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2007.00356.x
  7. 7.Sofroniew MV and Vinters HV. Astrocytes: biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119: 7–35. doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0619-8. pmid:20012068
  8. 8.Choi SS, Lee HJ, Lim I, Satoh J, Kim SU. Human astrocytes: secretome profiles of cytokines and chemokines. PLoS One. 2014;1: 9(4):e92325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092325.
  9. 9.van Kralingen C, Kho DT, Costa J, Angel CE, Graham ES. Exposure to inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNFα induces compromise and death of astrocytes; implications for chronic neuroinflammation. PLoS One. 2013;19;8(12): e84269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084269.
  10. 10.Zhang W, Smith C, Howlett C, Stanimirovic D. Inflammatory activation of human brain endothelial cells by hypoxic astrocytes in vitro is mediated by IL-1beta. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000;20: 967–978. pmid:10894180 doi: 10.1097/00004647-200006000-00009
  11. 11.Li C, Zhao R, Gao K, Wei Z, Yin MY, Lau LT et al. Astrocytes: implications for neuroinflammatory pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2011; 8: 67–80. pmid:21143158 doi: 10.2174/156720511794604543
  12. 12.Valles SL, Dolz-Gaiton P, Gambini J, Borras C, Lloret A, Pallardo FV. Estradiol or genistein prevent Alzheimer’s disease-associated inflammation correlating with an increase PPAR gamma expression in cultured astrocytes. Brain Res. 2010;1312: 138–144. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.044. pmid:19948157
  13. 13.Pacher P, Kunos G. Modulating the endocannabinoid system in human health and disease-successes and failures. FEBS J. 2013;280: 1918–1943. doi: 10.1111/febs.12260. pmid:23551849
  14. 14.Kunos G and Tam J. The case for peripheral CB₁ receptor blockade in the treatment of visceral obesity and its cardiometabolic complications. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;163: 1423–1431. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01352.x. pmid:21434882
  15. 15.Centonze D, Finazzi-Agrò A, Bernardi G, Maccarrone M. The endocannabinoid system in targeting inflammatory neurodegenerative diseases. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2007;28: 180–187. pmid:17350694 doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2007.02.004
  16. 16.Klein WK. Cannabinoid-based drugs as anti-inflammatory therapeutics. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5: 400–411. pmid:15864274 doi: 10.1038/nri1602
  17. 17.Hillard CJ, Weinlander KM, Stuhr KL. Contributions of endocannabinoid signaling to psychiatric disorders in humans: genetic and biochemical evidence. Neuroscience. 2012;1: 207–229. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.11.020
  18. 18.Guindon J, Hohmann AG. The endocannabinoid system and cancer: therapeutic implication. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;163: 1447–1463. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01327.x. pmid:21410463
  19. 19.Ramírez BG, Blázquez C, Gómez del Pulgar T, Guzmán M, de Ceballos ML. Prevention of Alzheimer’s disease pathology by cannabinoids: neuroprotection mediated by blockade of microglial activation. J Neurosci. 2005;25: 1904–1913. pmid:15728830 doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.4540-04.2005
  20. 20.Esposito G, Scuderi C, Savani C, Steardo L Jr, De Filippis D, Cottone P, et al. Cannabidiol in vivo blunts beta-amyloid induced neuroinflammation by suppressing IL-1beta and iNOS expression. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;151: 1272–1279. pmid:17592514 doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707337
  21. 21.Blanchard BJ, Chen A, Rozeboom LM, Stafford KA, Weigele P, Ingram VM. Efficient reversal of Alzheimer’s disease fibril formation and elimination of neurotoxicity by a small molecule. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2004;101: 14326–14332. pmid:15388848 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405941101
  22. 22.McGeer PL, McGeer EG. The amyloid cascade-inflammatory hypothesis of Alzheimer disease: implications for therapy. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;126: 479–497. doi: 10.1007/s00401-013-1177-7. pmid:24052108
  23. 23.Rönicke R, Klemm A, Meinhardt J, Schröder UH, Fändrich M, Reymann KG. Abeta mediated diminution of MTT reduction—an artefact of single cell culture?. PLoS One. 2008;3: e3236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003236. pmid:18800168
  24. 24.Palanca JM, Aguirre-Rueda D, Granell MV, Aldasoro M, Garcia A, Iradi A. Sugammadex, a neuromuscular blockade reversal agent, causes neuronal apoptosis in primary cultures. Int J Med Sci. 2013;10: 1278–1285. doi: 10.7150/ijms.6254. pmid:23983586
  25. 25.Peterson GL. A simplification of the protein assay method of Lowry et al. which is more generally applicable. Anal Biochem. 1977;83: 346–356. pmid:603028 doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(77)90043-4
  26. 26.Ricote M, Li AC, Willson TM, Kelly CJ, Glass CK. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma is a negative regulator of macrophage activation. Nature. 1998;391: 79–82. pmid:9422508
  27. 27.Eikelenboom P, van Gool WA. Neuroinflammatory perspectives on the two faces of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neural Transm. 2004;111: 281–294. pmid:14991455 doi: 10.1007/s00702-003-0055-1
  28. 28.Zhu X, Smith MA, Perry G, Aliev G. Mitochondrial failures in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2004;19: 345–352. pmid:15633943
  29. 29.Jiménez-Jiménez FJ, Alonso-Navarro H, Ayuso-Peralta L, Jabbour-Wadih T. Oxidative stress and Alzheimer’s disease. Rev Neurol. 2006;42: 419–427. pmid:16602059
  30. 30.Quintanilla RA, Orellana JA, von Bernhardi R. Understanding risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease: interplay of neuroinflammation, connexin-based communication and oxidative stress. Arch Med Res. 2012;43: 632–644. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2012.10.016. pmid:23142264
  31. 31.Milton NG. Anandamide and noladin ether prevent neurotoxicity of the human amyloid-beta peptide. Neurosci Lett. 2002;332: 127–130. pmid:12384227 doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)00936-9
  32. 32.Iuvone T, Esposito G, Esposito R, Santamaria R, Di Rosa M, Izzo AA. Neuroprotective effect of cannabidiol, a non-psychoactive component from Cannabis sativa, on beta-amyloid-induced toxicity in PC12 cells. J Neurochem. 2004;89: 134–141. pmid:15030397 doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2003.02327.x
  33. 33.Marsicano G, Wotjak CT, Azad SC, Bisogno T, Rammes G, Cascio MG, et al. The endogenous cannabinoid system controls extinction of aversive memories. Nature. 2002;1: 530–534. doi: 10.1038/nature00839
  34. 34.Gómez Del Pulgar T, De Ceballos ML, Guzmán M, Velasco G. Cannabinoids protect astrocytes from ceramide-induced apoptosis through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277: 36527–36533. pmid:12133838 doi: 10.1074/jbc.m205797200
  35. 35.Pourkhalili N, Ghahremani MH, Farsandaj N, Tavajohi S, Majdzadeh M, Parsa M, et al. Evaluation of anti-invasion effect of cannabinoids on human hepatocarcinoma cells. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2013;23: 120–126. doi: 10.3109/15376516.2012.730559. pmid:22978792
  36. 36.De Petrocellis L, Ligresti A, Schiano Moriello A, Iappelli M, Verde R, Stott CG, et al. Non-THC cannabinoids inhibit prostate carcinoma growth in vitro and in vivo: pro-apoptotic effects and underlying mechanisms. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;168: 79–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02027.x. pmid:22594963
  37. 37.Vara D, Salazar M, Olea-Herrero N, Guzmán M, Velasco G, Díaz-Laviada I. Anti-tumoral action of cannabinoids on hepatocellular carcinoma: role of AMPK-dependent activation of autophagy. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18: 1099–1111. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.32. pmid:21475304
  38. 38.Rocha FC, Dos Santos JG Júnior, Stefano SC, da Silveira DX. Systematic review of the literature on clinical and experimental trials on the antitumor effects of cannabinoids in gliomas. J Neurooncol. 2014:116: 11–24. doi: 10.1007/s11060-013-1277-1. pmid:24142199
  39. 39.Sánchez C, Galve-Roperh I, Canova C, Brachet P, Guzmán M. Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol induces apoptosis in C6 glioma cells. FEBS Lett. 1998;436: 6–10. pmid:9771884 doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)01085-0
  40. 40.Guzmán M, Sánchez C, Galve-Roperh I. Cannabinoids and cell fate. Pharmacol Ther. 2002;95: 175–184. pmid:12182964 doi: 10.1016/s0163-7258(02)00256-5
  41. 41.Stella N. Cannabinoid signaling in glial cells. Glia. 2004;48: 267–277. pmid:15390110 doi: 10.1002/glia.20084
  42. 42.Sheng WS, Hu S, min X, Cabral GA, Lokensgard JR, Peterson P. Synthetic cannabinoid WIN55,212–2 inhibits generation of inflammatory mediators by IL-1beta.stimulated human astrocytes. Glia. 2005;49: 211–219. pmid:15390091 doi: 10.1002/glia.20108
  43. 43.Palmer SL, Thakur GA, Makriyannis A. Cannabinergic ligands. Chem Phys Lipids. 2002;121: 3–19. pmid:12505686 doi: 10.1016/s0009-3084(02)00143-3
  44. 44.Fakhfouri G, Ahmadiani A, Rahimian R, Grolla AA, Moradi F, Haeri A. WIN55212-2 attenuates amyloid-beta-induced neuroinflammation in rats through activation of cannabinoid receptors and PPAR-γ pathway. Neuropharmacology. 2012;63: 653–666 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.05.013. pmid:22634229
  45. 45.Strohmeyer R, Rogers J. Molecular and cellular mediators of Alzheimer’s disease inflammation. J Alzheimers Dis. 2001;3: 131–157. pmid:12214082 doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8350-4_1
  46. 46.Wyss-Coray T, Mucke L. Inflammation in neurodegenerative disease-A doubleedged sword. Neuron. 2002;35: 419–432. pmid:12165466 doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00794-8
  47. 47.Griffin WS, Mrak RE. Interleukin-1 in the genesis and progression of and risk for development of neuronal degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. J Leukoc Biol. 2002;72: 233–238. pmid:12149413
  48. 48.McGeer PL, Rogers J, McGeer EG. Inflammation, anti-inflammatory agents and Alzheimer disease: the last 12 years. J Alzheimers Dis. 2006;9: 271–276. pmid:16914866
  49. 49.Allan SM, Rothwell NJ. Cytokines and acute neurodegeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2: 734–744. pmid:11584311 doi: 10.1038/35094583
  50. 50.Allan SM, Rothwell NJ. Inflammation in central nervous system injury. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003;358: 1669–1677. pmid:14561325 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1358
  51. 51.Burkert K, Moodley K, Angel CE, Brooks A, Graham ES. Detailed analysis of inflammatory and neuromodulatory cytokine secretion from human NT2 astrocytes using multiplex bead array. Neurochem Int. 2012;60: 573–580. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2011.09.002. pmid:21939706
  52. 52.Carrero I, Gonzalo MR, Martin B, Sanz-Anquela JM, Arévalo-Serrano J, Gonzalo-Ruiz A. Oligomers of β-amyloid protein (Aβ1–42) induce the activation of cyclooxygenase-2 in astrocytes via an interaction with interleukin-1β, tumour necrosis factor-α, and a nuclear factor κ-B mechanism in the rat brain. Exp Neurol. 2012; 236: 215–227. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.05.004. pmid:22617488
  53. 53.Vallés S, Tsoi C, Huang WY, Wyllie D, Carlotti F, Askari JA, et al. Recruitment of a heparan sulfate subunit to the interleukin-1 receptor complex. Regulation by fibronectin attachment. J Biol Chem. 1999;274: 20103–20109. pmid:10400621 doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.29.20103
  54. 54.Bondareff W. Age-related changes in brain extracellular space affect processing of amyloid-β peptides in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;35: 1–6. doi: 10.3233/JAD-122305. pmid:23364138
  55. 55.Sheng WS, Hu S, Min X, Cabral GA, Lokensgard JR, Peterson PK. Synthetic cannabinoid WIN55,212–2 inhibits generation of inflammatory mediators by IL-1beta-stimulated human astrocytes. Glia. 2005;49: 211–219. pmid:15390091 doi: 10.1002/glia.20108
  56. 56.Esposito G, Scuderi C, Valenza M, Togna GI, Latina V, De Filippis D, et al. Cannabidiol reduces Aβ-induced neuroinflammation and promotes hippocampal neurogenesis through PPARγ involvement. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e28668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028668. pmid:22163051
  57. 57.Scuderi C, Esposito G, Blasio A, Valenza M, Arietti P, Steardo L Jr, et al. Palmitoylethanolamide counteracts reactive astrogliosis induced by β-amyloid peptide. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15: 2664–2674. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01267.x. pmid:21255263
  58. 58.Puffenbarger RA, Boothe AC, Cabral GA. Cannabinoids inhibit LPS-inducible cytokine mRNA expression in rat microglial cells. Glia. 2000;29: 58–69. pmid:10594923 doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1136(20000101)29:1<58::aid-glia6>3.3.co;2-n
  59. 59.Facchinetti F, Del Giudice E, Furegato S, Passarotto M, Leon A. Cannabinoids ablate release of TNFalpha in rat microglial cells stimulated with lypopolysaccharide. Glia. 2003;41: 161–168. pmid:12509806 doi: 10.1002/glia.10177
  60. 60.Ehrhart J, Obregon D, Mori T, Hou H, Sun N, Bai Y, et al. Stimulation of cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) suppresses microglial activation. J Neuroinflammation. 2005;12: 2–29.
  61. 61.Castillo A, Tolón MR, Fernández-Ruiz J, Romero J, Martinez-Orgado J. The neuroprotective effect of cannabidiol in an in vitro model of newborn hypoxic-ischemic brain damage in mice is mediated by CB (2) and adenosine receptors. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;37: 434–440. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.10.023. pmid:19900555
  62. 62.Martín-Moreno AM, Reigada D, Ramírez BG, Mechoulam R, Innamorato N, Cuadrado A, et al. Cannabidiol and other cannabinoids reduce microglial activation in vitro and in vivo: relevance to Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Pharmacol. 2011;79: 964–973. doi: 10.1124/mol.111.071290. pmid:21350020
  63. 63.Martín-Moreno AM, Brera B, Spuch C, Carro E, García-García L, Delgado M, et al. Prolonged oral cannabinoid administration prevents neuroinflammation, lowers β-amyloid levels and improves cognitive performance in Tg APP 2576 mice. J Neuroinflammation. 2012; Jan 16 9:8. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-8. pmid:22248049
  64. 64.Esposito G, De Filippis D, Carnuccio R, Izzo AA, Iuvone T. The marijuana component cannabidiol inhibits β-amyloid-induced tau protein hyperphosphorylation through Wnt/β-catenin pathway rescue PC12 cells. J Mol Med. 2006;84: 253–258. pmid:16389547 doi: 10.1007/s00109-005-0025-1
  65. 65.Kainu T, Wikström AC, Gustafsson JA, Pelto-Huikko M. Localization of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor in the brain. Neuroreport. 1994;5: 2481–2485. pmid:7696585 doi: 10.1097/00001756-199412000-00019
  66. 66.Luna-Medina R, Cortes-Canteli M, Alonso M, Santos A, Martínez A, Perez-Castillo A. Regulation of inflammatory response in neural cells in vitro by thiadiazolidinones derivatives through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activation. J Biol Chem. 2005;280: 21453–21462. pmid:15817469 doi: 10.1074/jbc.m414390200
  67. 67.Bright JJ, Kanakasabai S, Chearwae W, Chakraborty S. PPAR Regulation of Inflammatory Signaling in CNS Diseases. PPAR Res. 2008;658520. doi: 10.1155/2008/658520.
  68. 68.Kapadia R, Yi JH, Vemuganti R. Mechanisms of anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective actions of PPAR-γ agonists. Front Biosci. 2008;13: 1813–1826. pmid:17981670 doi: 10.2741/2802
  69. 69.Landreth G, Jiang Q, Mandrekar S, Heneka M. PPARgamma agonists as therapeutics for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurotherapeutics. 2008;5: 481–489. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2008.05.003. pmid:18625459
  70. 70.Bodles AM, Barger SW. Secreted β-amyloid precursor protein activates microglia via JNK and p38-MAPK. Neurobiol Aging. 2005;26: 9–16. pmid:15585341 doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.02.022
  71. 71.Ho GJ, Drego R, Hakimian E, Masliah E. Mechanisms of cell signaling and inflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy. 2005;4: 247–256. pmid:15853747 doi: 10.2174/1568010053586237
  72. 72.Wang HM, Zhao YX, Zhang S, Liu GD, Kang WY, Tang HD, et al. PPARgamma agonist curcumin reduces the amyloid-beta-stimulated inflammatory responses in primary astrocytes. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20: 1189–1199. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-091336. pmid:20413894
  73. 73.Chen YC, Wu JS, Tsai HD, Huang CY, Chen JJ, Sun GY, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) and neurodegenerative disorders. Mol Neurobiol. 2012;46: 114–124. doi: 10.1007/s12035-012-8259-8. pmid:22434581
  74. 74.Aguirre-Rueda D, Guerra-Ojeda S, Aldasoro M, Iradi A, Obrador E, Ortega A, et al. Astrocytes protect neurons from Aβ1–42 peptide-induced neurotoxicity increasing TFAM and PGC-1 and decreasing PPAR-γ and SIRT-1. Int J Med Sci. 2015;12: 48–56. doi: 10.7150/ijms.10035. pmid:25552918
  75. 75.Sun Y, Bennett A Cannabinoids: a new group of agonists of PPARs. PPAR Res. 2007;23513. doi: 10.1155/2007/23513.
  76. 76.Wallace DC. Mitochondrial defects in cardiomyopathy and neuromuscular disease. Am Heart J. 2000;139: S70–S85. pmid:10650320 doi: 10.1067/mhj.2000.103934
  77. 77.Lesnefsky EJ, Moghaddas S, Tandler B, Kerner J, Hoppel CL. Mitochondrial dysfunction in cardiac disease: ischemia—reperfusion, aging, and heart failure. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2001;33: 1065–1089. pmid:11444914 doi: 10.1006/jmcc.2001.1378
  78. 78.Chen Q, Vazquez EJ, Moghaddas S, Hoppel CL, Lesnefsky EJ. Production of reactive oxygen species by mitochondria: central role of complex III. J Biol Chem. 2003;278: 36027–36031. pmid:12840017 doi: 10.1074/jbc.m304854200
  79. 79.Abeti R, Duchen MR. Activation of PARP by Oxidative Stress Induced by β-Amyloid: Implications for Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurochem Res. 2012;37: 2589–2596. doi: 10.1007/s11064-012-0895-x. pmid:23076628
  80. 80.Marcus DL, Thomas C, Rodriguez C, Simberkoff K, Tsai JS, Strafaci JA, et al. Increased peroxidation and reduced antioxidant enzyme activity in Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Neurol. 1998;150: 40–44. pmid:9514828 doi: 10.1006/exnr.1997.6750
  81. 81.Padurariu M, Ciobica A, Hritcu L, Stoica B, Bild W, Stefanescu C. Changes of some oxidative stress markers in the serum of patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience Letters. 2010;469: 6–10. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.11.033. pmid:19914330
  82. 82.Pappolla MA, Chyan YJ, Omar RA, Hsiao K, Perry G, Smith MA, et al. Evidence of oxidative stress and in vivo neurotoxicity of beta-amyloid in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease: a chronic oxidative paradigm for testing antioxidant therapies in vivo. Am J Pathol. 1998;152: 871–877. pmid:9546346
  83. 83.Hampson AJ, Grimaldi M, Axelrod J, Wink D. Cannabidiol and (-) Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol are neuroprotective antioxidants. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1998;95: 8268–8273. pmid:9653176 doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.14.8268
  84. 84.Hampson AJ, Grimaldi M. Cannabinoid receptor activation and elevated cyclic AMP reduce glutamate neurotoxicity. Eur J Neurosci. 2001;13: 1529–1536. pmid:11328347 doi: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01536.x
  85. 85.Chen Y, Buck J. Cannabinoids protect cells from oxidative cell death: a receptor-independent mechanism. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2000;293: 807–812. pmid:10869379
  86. 86.Praticò D MY Lee V, Trojanowski JQ, Rokach J, Fitzgerald GA. Increased F2-isoprostanes in Alzheimer’s disease: evidence for enhanced lipid peroxidation in vivo. FASEB J. 1998;12: 1777–1783. pmid:9837868
  87. 87.Keller JN, Kindy MS, Holtsberg FW, St Clair DK, Yen HC, Germeyer A, et al. Mitochondrial manganese superoxide dismutase prevents neural apoptosis and reduces ischemic brain injury: suppression of peroxynitrite production, lipid peroxidation, and mitochondrial dysfunction. J Neurosci. 1998;18: 687–697. pmid:9425011
  88. 88.Sompol P, Ittarat W, Tangpong J, Chen Y, Doubinskaia I, Batinic-Haberle I, et al. A neuronal model of Alzheimer’s disease: an insight into the mechanisms of oxidative stress-mediated mitochondrial injury. Neuroscience. 2008;153: 120–130. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.01.044. pmid:18353561
  89. 89.Dumont M, Wille E, Stack C, Calingasan NY, Beal MF, Lin MT. Reduction of oxidative stress, amyloid deposition, and memory deficit by manganese superoxide dismutase overexpression in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. FASEB J. 2009;23: 2459–2466. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-132928. pmid:19346295
  90. 90.Esposito L, Raber J, Kekonius L, Yan F, Yu GQ, Bien-Ly N, et al. Reduction in mitochondrial superoxide dismutase modulates Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology and accelerates the onset of behavioral changes in human amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice. J Neurosci. 2006;26: 5167–5179. pmid:16687508 doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.0482-06.2006
  91. 91.Volicer L, Stelly M, Morris J, McLaughlin J, Volicer BJ. Effects of dronabinol on anorexia and disturbed behavior in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1997;12: 913–919. pmid:9309469 doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199709)12:9<913::aid-gps663>3.0.co;2-d
  92. 92.Walther S, Mahlberg R, Eichmann U, Kunz D. 9-tetrahydrocannabinol for nighttime agitation in severe dementia. Psychopharmacology. 2006;185: 524–528. pmid:16521031 doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0343-1
  93. 93.Krishnan S, Cairns R, Howard R. (2009) Cannabinoids for the treatment of dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 15;(2): CD007204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.