Skip to main content
Canna~Fangled Abstracts

Modeling cannabinoids from a large-scale sample of Cannabis sativa chemotypes

By September 1, 2020September 7th, 2020No Comments

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236878. eCollection 2020.

Affiliations

Free PMC article

Abstract

The widespread legalization of Cannabis has opened the industry to using contemporary analytical techniques for chemotype analysis. Chemotypic data has been collected on a large variety of oil profiles inherent to the cultivars that are commercially available. The unknown gene regulation and pharmacokinetics of dozens of cannabinoids offer opportunities of high interest in pharmacology research. Retailers in many medical and recreational jurisdictions are typically required to report chemical concentrations of at least some cannabinoids. Commercial cannabis laboratories have collected large chemotype datasets of diverse Cannabis cultivars. In this work a data set of 17,600 cultivars tested by Steep Hill Inc., is examined using machine learning techniques to interpolate missing chemotype observations and cluster cultivars into groups based on chemotype similarity. The results indicate cultivars cluster based on their chemotypes, and that some imputation methods work better than others at grouping these cultivars based on chemotypic identity. Due to the missing data and to the low signal to noise ratio for some less common cannabinoids, their behavior could not be accurately predicted. These findings have implications for characterizing complex interactions in cannabinoid biosynthesis and improving phenotypical classification of Cannabis cultivars.

Conflict of interest statement

D.V. is the founder and president of the non-profit organization Agricultural Genomics Foundation, and the sole owner of CGRI, LLC. R.G., and T.B. are employees of Front Range Biosciences and previously of Steep Hill, Inc.

References

    1. Genetics. 2003 Jan;163(1):335-46 – PubMed
    1. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2020 Apr 29;71:713-739 – PubMed
    1. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:549-76 – PubMed
    1. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;978:205-16 – PubMed
    1. Biol Pharm Bull. 2011;34(5):774-8 – PubMed

LinkOut – more resources

Leave a Reply