Skip to main content
Canna~Fangled Abstracts

The analysis of classical, polynomial regression and cubic spline mathematical models in hemp biodiesel optimization: an experimental comparison

By January 8, 2024January 10th, 2024No Comments

doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31720-0.

Online ahead of print.
Affiliations 

Abstract

Post-pandemic inflationist pressures, climate changes and extremes, regional conflicts, and soaring food prices caused the food crisis to increase rapidly worldwide. This global problem directs producers and researchers to use oils used as feedstock in biodiesel production effectively. In this context, it is important to assay the transesterification parameters and conduct new optimization studies to increase biodiesel yield. In this study, methyl ester was produced from hemp oil by transesterification using sodium hydroxide (NaOH). Next, classical optimization study was carried out to determine the effects of catalyst amount, alcohol:oil molar ratio, reaction temperature, and reaction time variables on biodiesel yield. Secondly, the cubic spline mathematical model (CSMM) and polynomial regression mathematical model (PRMM) were applied to the first data of this optimization. Among these optimization methods, the utmost biodiesel yield registered was 96.115% at hemp seed oil (HSO):methanol molar ratio of 5.59:1, catalyst concentration of 0.531 wt%, reaction temperature of 42.5 °C, reaction time of 62.1 min, and agitation intensity of 600 rpm at PRMM. Some vital fuel properties obtained from HSO biodiesels as a result of three optimizations satisfied the EN 14214 standard. The results illustrated that the optimal yields from CSMM and PRMM are 0.765% and 1.065% higher, respectively, according to the maximum efficiency obtained from the classical optimization. The outcomes showed that CSMM and PRMM are cost-effective, easy to handle, and promising new approaches.

Keywords: Biodiesel production; Cannabis sativa; Fuel properties; Mathematical methods; Non-vegetable oil; Yield.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abbah EC, Nwandikom GI, Egwuonwu CC, Nwakuba NR (2016) Effect of reaction temperature on the yield of biodiesel from neem seed oil. Am J Energy Sci 3(3):16–20
    1. Adenuga AA, Idowu OO, Oyekunle JAO (2020) Synthesis of quality biodiesel from Calophyllum inophyllum kernels through reactive extraction method: Optimization of process parameters and characterization of the products. Renew Energ 145:2530–2537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.035 – DOI
    1. Agarwal M, Singh K, Chaurasia SP (2010) Prediction of biodiesel properties from fatty acid composition using linear regression and ANN techniques. Indian Chem Eng 52(4):347–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00194506.2010.616325 – DOI
    1. Ahmad M, Ullah K, Khan MA, Zafar M, Tariq M, Ali S, Sultana S (2011) Physicochemical analysis of hemp oil biodiesel: a promising non edible new source for bioenergy. Energy Sources a: Recovery Util Environ Eff 33(14):1365–1374. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2010.499420 – DOI
    1. Ahmad M, Khan MA, Zafar M, Sultana S (2012) Practical handbook on biodiesel production and properties. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b12719 – DOI

LinkOut – more resources


Leave a Reply