Skip to main content
Canna~Fangled Abstracts

Cannabidiol and Tetrahydrocannabinol Antinociceptive Activity is Mediated by Distinct Receptors in Caenorhabditis elegans

By December 23, 2023January 8th, 2024No Comments

doi: 10.1007/s11064-023-04069-6.

Online ahead of print.
Affiliations 

Abstract

Cannabis has gained popularity in recent years as a substitute treatment for pain following the risks of typical treatments uncovered by the opioid crisis. The active ingredients frequently associated with pain-relieving effects are the phytocannabinoids Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), but their effectiveness and mechanisms of action are still under research. In this study, we used Caenorhabditis elegans, an ideal model organism for the study of nociception that expresses mammal ortholog cannabinoid (NPR-19 and NPR-32) and vanilloid (OSM-9 and OCR-2) receptors. Here, we evaluated the antinociceptive activity of THC and CBD, identifying receptor targets and several metabolic pathways activated following exposure to these molecules. The thermal avoidance index was used to phenotype each tested C. elegans experimental group. The data revealed for the first time that THC and CBD decreases the nocifensive response of C. elegans to noxious heat (32-35 °C). The effect was reversed 6 h post- CBD exposure but not for THC. Further investigations using specific mutants revealed CBD and THC are targeting different systems, namely the vanilloid and cannabinoid systems, respectively. Proteomic analysis revealed differences following Reactome pathways and gene ontology biological process database enrichment analyses between CBD or THC-treated nematodes and provided insights into potential targets for future drug development.

Keywords: Caenorhabditis elegans; Cannabidiol; Cannabis sativa; Nociception; Pain; Phytocannabinoid; Proteomics; Tetrahydrocannabinol; Vanilloid receptor.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mills SEE, Nicolson KP, Smith BH (2019) Chronic pain: a review of its epidemiology and associated factors in population-based studies. Brit J Anaesth 123:e273–e283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.023 – DOI – PubMed – PMC
    1. Cohen SP, Vase L, Hooten WM (2021) Chronic pain: an update on burden, best practices, and new advances. Lancet 397:2082–2097. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00393-7 – DOI – PubMed
    1. Knotkova H, Hamani C, Sivanesan E et al (2021) Neuromodulation for chronic pain. Lancet 397:2111–2124. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00794-7 – DOI – PubMed
    1. Rosser BA, Fisher E, Eccleston C et al (2021) Psychological therapies delivered remotely for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane Db Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd013863 – DOI
    1. Finnerup NB (2019) Nonnarcotic methods of pain management. New Engl J Med 380:2440–2448. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra1807061 – DOI – PubMed

LinkOut – more resources


Leave a Reply