Skip to main content
Canna~Fangled Abstracts

Differentiation of industrial hemp strains by their cannabinoid and phenolic compounds using LC × LC-HRMS

By March 17, 2022March 21st, 2022No Comments
. 2022 Mar 17.

doi: 10.1007/s00216-022-03925-8.

Online ahead of print.
Lidia Montero 1 2, Sven W Meckelmann 3 4, Hyerin Kim 3 4, Juan F Ayala-Cabrera 3 4, Oliver J Schmitz 3 4
Affiliations 

Abstract

Cannabis is an ancient plant that has been used for therapeutic and recreational purposes. Nowadays, industrial hemp, a variety with low concentration of the psychoactive cannabinoid Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and high concentration of non-psychoactive cannabinoids, is getting more and more interest in the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industry. However, cannabis not only contains cannabinoids as bioactive components but also other metabolites like terpenes and phenolic compounds, and the content of these interesting secondary metabolites greatly differs with the genetic variety of the plant. Due to the huge complexity of composition of the cannabis matrix, in this work, a comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC × LC) method has been developed as a very power separation technique coupling a pentafluorophenyl (PFP) and a C18 in the first and second dimensions. Two industrial hemp strains (cookie and gelato) were analyzed to determine the difference in their content of cannabinoids and phenolic compounds. To do this, a new demodulation process was applied for the first time to transform 2D raw data into 1D data which allowed carrying out the chemometric analysis needed to determine the statistical differences between the hemp strains. The cookie strain presented a total of 41 cannabinoid markers, while the gelato strain presented more representative phenolic compounds, in total 24 phenolic compounds were detected as potential markers of this sample. These differences in the chemical composition could determine the industrial destiny of the different hemp strains.

Keywords: 2D demodulation data treatment; Cannabinoids; Industrial hemp; LC × LC–MS; Phenolic compounds.

References

    1. ElSohly MA, Slade D. Chemical constituents of marijuana: the complex mixture of natural cannabinoids. Life Sci. 2005;78(5):539–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2005.09.011 . – DOI – PubMed
    1. Farinon B, Molinari R, Costantini L, Merendino N. The seed of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.): nutritional quality and potential functionality for human health and nutrition. Nutrients. 2020;12(7):1935. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12071935 . – DOI – PMC
    1. Bow EW, Rimoldi JM. The structure–function relationships of classical cannabinoids: CB1/CB2 modulation. Perspect Medicin Chem. 2016;8:PMC. S32171. https://doi.org/10.4137/PMC.S32171
    1. Pollastro F, Minassi A, Fresu LG. Cannabis phenolics and their bioactivities. Curr Med Chem. 2018;25(10):1160–85. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867324666170810164636 . – DOI – PubMed
    1. Irakli M, Tsaliki E, Kalivas A, Kleisiaris F, Sarrou E, Cook CM. Effect οf genotype and growing year on the nutritional, phytochemical, and antioxidant properties of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) seeds. Antioxidants. 2019;8(10):491. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8100491 . – DOI – PMC

Leave a Reply