Abstract
Consumer use of cannabidiol (CBD) for personal wellness purposes has garnered much public interest. However, safety-related data on CBD in the public domain are limited, including a lack of quality studies evaluating its genotoxic potential. The quality of available studies is limited due to the test material used (e.g., low CBD purity) and/or study design, leading some global regulatory agencies to highlight genotoxicity as an important data gap for CBD. To address this gap, the genotoxic potential of a pure CBD isolate was investigated in a battery of three genotoxicity assays conducted according to OECD testing guidelines. In an in vitro microbial reverse mutation assay, CBD up to 5000 μg/plate was negative in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537, and Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA, with and without metabolic activation. Testing in an in vitro micronucleus assay was negative in human TK6 cells up to 10-11 μg/mL, with and without metabolic activation. Finally, an in vivo micronucleus assay conducted in male and female rats was negative for genotoxicity up to 1000 mg/kg-bw/d. Bioanalysis of CBD and its primary metabolite, 7-carboxy CBD, confirmed a dose-related increase in plasma exposure. Together, these assays indicate that CBD is unlikely to pose a genotoxic hazard.
Keywords: Ames, CBD, Cannabidiol, Genotoxicity, Micronucleus, Mutagenicity
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest This work was funded by Canopy Growth Corporation. Authors KRT, TWL, and MOB-M were employees of Canopy Growth Corporation during the conduct and drafting of this study; during their employment, they received stock options. ToxStrategies, a private consulting firm providing services on toxicology and risk assessment issues, received funds for conducting this work. Authors RGH, SJB, and MMH are employees of ToxStrategies.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the genotoxic potential of single-wall carbon nanotubes by using a battery of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity assays.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Nov;61(2):192-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.07.008. Epub 2011 Jul 29.PMID: 21821090
-
Genotoxicity and mutagenicity evaluation of isoquercitrin-γ-cyclodextrin molecular inclusion complex using Ames test and a combined micronucleus and comet assay in rats.J Toxicol Sci. 2022;47(6):221-235. doi: 10.2131/jts.47.221.PMID: 35650139
-
Genotoxicity evaluation of a Phragmitis rhizoma extract using a standard battery of in vitro and in vivo assays.J Ethnopharmacol. 2019 Sep 15;241:112025. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.112025. Epub 2019 Jun 9.PMID: 31189082
-
Mutagenicity and genotoxicity studies of aspartame.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;103:345-351. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.01.023. Epub 2018 Feb 19.PMID: 29408486 Review.
-
Recommendations for the performance of bacterial mutation assays.Mutat Res. 1994 Jun;312(3):217-33. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(94)90037-x.PMID: 7514736 Review.