Skip to main content
Canna~Fangled Abstracts

Identification of Cannabidiolic and Cannabigerolic Acids as MTDL AChE, BuChE, and BACE-1 Inhibitors Against Alzheimer’s Disease by In Silico, In Vitro, and In Vivo Studies

By November 7, 2024November 15th, 2024No Comments


doi: 10.1002/ptr.8369.

Online ahead of print.
Affiliations 

Abstract

Cannabidiolic (CBDA) and cannabigerolic (CBGA) acids are naturally occurring compounds from Cannabis sativa plant, previously identified by us as dual PPARα/γ agonists. Since the development of multitarget-directed ligands (MTDL) represents a valuable strategy to alleviate and slow down the progression of multifactorial diseases, we evaluated the potential ability of CBDA and CBGA to also inhibit enzymes involved in the modulation of the cholinergic tone and/or β-amyloid production. A multidisciplinary approach based on computational and biochemical studies was pursued on selected enzymes, followed by behavioral and electrophysiological experiments in an AD mouse model. The β-arrestin assay on GPR109A and qPCR on TRPM7 were also carried out. CBDA and CBGA are effective on both acetyl- and butyryl-cholinesterases (AChE/BuChE), as well as on β-secretase-1 (BACE-1) enzymes in a low micromolar range, and they also prevent aggregation of β-amyloid fibrils. Computational studies provided a rationale for the competitive (AChE) vs. noncompetitive (BuChE) inhibitory profile of the two ligands. The repeated treatment with CBDA and CBGA (10 mg/kg, i.p.) improved the cognitive deficit induced by the β-amyloid peptide. A recovery of the long-term potentiation in the hippocampus was observed, where the treatment with CBGA and CBDA also restored the physiological expression level of TRPM7, a receptor channel involved in neurodegenerative diseases. We also showed that these compounds do not stimulate GPR109A in β-arrestin assay. Collectively, these data broaden the pharmacological profile of CBDA and CBGA and suggest their potential use as novel anti-AD MTDLs.

Keywords: BACE‐1; alzheimer’s disease; beta‐amyloid peptide; cholinesterase enzymes; molecular docking; molecular dynamics; phytocannabinoids.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aksoz, E., B. A. Akyol, and O. Korkut. 2024. “The Role of the Cholinergic System in the Memory‐Protecting Effects of Metformin in a Model of Scopolamine‐Induced Memory Impairment in Aged Rats.” Behavioural Brain Research 466: 114978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2024.114978.
    1. Anderson, L. L., I. K. Low, S. D. Banister, I. S. McGregor, and J. C. Arnold. 2019. “Pharmacokinetics of Phytocannabinoid Acids and Anticonvulsant Effect of Cannabidiolic Acid in a Mouse Model of Dravet Syndrome.” Journal of Natural Products 82, no. 11: 3047–3055. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b00600.
    1. Appendino, G., S. Gibbons, A. Giana, et al. 2008. “Antibacterial Cannabinoids From Cannabis Sativa: A Structure−Activity Study.” Journal of Natural Products 71, no. 8: 1427–1430. https://doi.org/10.1021/np8002673.
    1. Atanasov, A. G., S. B. Zotchev, V. M. Dirsch, and C. T. Supuran. 2021. “Natural Products in Drug Discovery: Advances and Opportunities.” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 20, no. 3: 200–216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573‐020‐00114‐z.
    1. Bajda, M., A. Więckowska, M. Hebda, N. Guzior, C. Sotriffer, and B. Malawska. 2013. “Structure‐Based Search for New Inhibitors of Cholinesterases.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 14, no. 3: 5608–5632. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14035608.

Leave a Reply