- PMID: 33181893
- DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107474
Abstract
Introduction: An intermediate-sized, multicenter, expanded-access study was opened in 2015 through the support of the State of Georgia. This study provided children with treatment-resistant epilepsy (TRE) access to plant-derived highly purified cannabidiol (CBD; Epidiolex® in the US; Epidyolex® in the EU; 100 mg/mL oral solution). These children had failed to achieve seizure freedom with available treatment options and were ineligible to participate in randomized controlled trials that only included patients with Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndromes.
Methods: Cannabidiol safety, changes in seizure type, frequency, and seizure-free days were evaluated for children aged 1-18 years (at time of consent) as an adjunctive treatment for 36 months. The study consisted of a two-month baseline period, a titration period, treatment period, and optional titration period, which occurred after ≥26 weeks of treatment. Cannabidiol treatment was administered up to a targeted dose of 25 mg/kg/day, with an optional secondary treatment up to 50 mg/kg/day. Daily seizure type, seizure frequency, and seizure-free days were recorded in a Web-based diary, and changes in these outcomes were recorded and analyzed for the duration of the study. The occurrence of adverse events (AEs) was also recorded.
Results: The median percentage change in seizures for 45 patients in Months 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 showed a statistically significant (p < 0.001) reduction in major seizures (ranging from 54 to 72% at various time points) and all seizures (61-70%) compared with baseline. A mean increase in seizure-free days per 28 days was >5 in all treatment periods after Month 2, and an average increase of 7.52 (p < 0.001) seizure-free days per 28 days was observed at the end of follow-up compared with baseline. All patients experienced ≥1 AE. Children who transitioned to the optional secondary treatment (high-dose group) reported more AEs before increasing their dose to >25.0 mg/kg/day compared with the low-dose group. However, the average rate of AEs was significantly lower after moving to a high-dose regimen (p = 0.004). Twelve children reported 20 serious AEs, none of which were considered related to CBD.
Conclusions: This study supports CBD as an adjunctive treatment for children with TRE. Treatment was well tolerated in doses up to 50 mg/kg/day. Patients who did not achieve desired results at a dose of ≤25.0 mg/kg/day reported more AEs when CBD dose increased to >25.0 mg/kg/day. Decreases in major seizure frequency and an increase in seizure-free days compared with baseline were reported during treatment. This supports the efficacy and tolerability of CBD for mixed seizure etiologies.
Keywords: Cannabidiol, Pediatric epilepsy, Treatment-resistant epilepsy
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest Yong Park, MD served as a speaker and consultant for Greenwich Biosciences, Inc. All other authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Don’t Fear the Reefer-Evidence Mounts for Plant-Based Cannabidiol as Treatment for Epilepsy.Epilepsy Curr. 2019 Mar-Apr;19(2):93-95. doi: 10.1177/1535759719835671.PMID: 30955420 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term safety and efficacy of cannabidiol in children and adults with treatment resistant Lennox-Gastaut syndrome or Dravet syndrome: Expanded access program results.Epilepsy Res. 2019 Aug;154:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.03.015. Epub 2019 Mar 25.PMID: 31022635 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-Term Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Cannabidiol in Children with Refractory Epilepsy: Results from an Expanded Access Program in the US.CNS Drugs. 2019 Jan;33(1):47-60. doi: 10.1007/s40263-018-0589-2.PMID: 30460546
-
Cannabis for the Treatment of Epilepsy: an Update.Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018 Sep 8;18(11):73. doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0882-y.PMID: 30194563 Review.
-
Pharmacological and Therapeutic Properties of Cannabidiol for Epilepsy.Drugs. 2019 Sep;79(13):1435-1454. doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-01171-4.PMID: 31372958 Review.