Abstract
Background: Many anti-nausea treatments are available for chronic gastrointestinal syndromes, but data on efficacy and comparative effectiveness are sparse.
Aims: To conduct a sectional survey study of patients with chronic nausea to assess comparative effectiveness of commonly used anti-nausea treatments.
Methods: Outpatients at a single center presenting for gastroenterology evaluation were asked to rate anti-nausea efficacy on a scale of 0 (no efficacy) to 5 (very effective) of 29 commonly used anti-nausea treatments and provide other information about their symptoms. Additional information was collected from the patients’ chart. The primary outcome was to determine which treatments were better or worse than average using a t test. The secondary outcome was to assess differential response by individual patient characteristics using multiple linear regression.
Results: One hundred and fifty-three patients completed the survey. The mean efficacy score of all anti-nausea treatments evaluated was 1.73. After adjustment, three treatments had scores statically higher than the mean, including marijuana (2.75, p < 0.0001), ondansetron (2.64, p < 0.0001), and promethazine (2.46, p < 0.0001). Several treatments, including many neuromodulators, complementary and alternative treatments, erythromycin, and diphenhydramine had scores statistically below average. Patients with more severe nausea responded better to marijuana (p = 0.036) and diphenhydramine (p < 0.001) and less so to metoclopramide (p = 0.020). There was otherwise no significant differential response by age, gender, nausea localization, underlying gastrointestinal cause of nausea, and GCSI.
Conclusions: When treating nausea in patients with chronic gastrointestinal syndromes, clinicians may consider trying higher performing treatments first, and forgoing lower performing treatments. Further prospective research is needed, particularly with respect to highly effective treatments.
Keywords: Alternative medicine, Cannabinoids, Functional gastrointestinal disorders, Gastroparesis, Nausea
Similar articles
-
Treatments for Hyperemesis Gravidarum and Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.JAMA. 2016 Oct 4;316(13):1392-1401. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14337.PMID: 27701665 Review.
-
A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of ondansetron, metoclopramide, and promethazine in adults.Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;29(3):247-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.09.028. Epub 2010 Mar 26.PMID: 20825792 Clinical Trial.
-
Interventions for treating hyperemesis gravidarum.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 11;(5):CD010607. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010607.pub2.PMID: 27168518 Review.
-
Interventions for treating hyperemesis gravidarum: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Sep;31(18):2492-2505. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1342805. Epub 2017 Jul 11.PMID: 28614956 Review.
-
Comparison of the efficacy and side-effects of ondansetron and metoclopramide-diphenhydramine administered to control nausea and vomiting in children treated with antineoplastic chemotherapy: a prospective randomized study.Eur J Pediatr. 1998 Oct;157(10):806-10. doi: 10.1007/s004310050940.PMID: 9809818 Clinical Trial.