Skip to main content
Canna~Fangled Abstracts

Single and Mixed Feedstocks Biorefining: Comparison of Primary Metabolites Recovery and Lignin Recombination During an Alkaline Process

By June 5, 2020June 25th, 2020No Comments

doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00479. eCollection 2020.

Affiliations

Abstract

Cannabis sp. and Euphorbia sp. are potential candidates as indoor culture for the extraction of their high value-added metabolites for pharmaceutical applications. Both residual lignocellulosic materials recovered after extraction are studied in the present article as single or mixed feedstocks for a closed-loop bioprocesses cascade. An alkaline process (NaOH 3%, 30 min 160°C) is performed to separate the studied biomasses into their main components: lignin and cellulose. Results highlight the advantages of the multi-feedstocks approach over the single biomass in term of lignin yield and purity. Since the structural characteristics of lignin affect the potential applications, a particular attention is drawn on the comprehension of lignin structure alteration and the possible interaction between them during single or mixed feedstocks treatment. FTIR and 2D-NMR spectra revealed similar profiles in term of chemical functions and structure rather than novel chemical bonds formation inexistent in the original biomasses. In addition, thermal properties and molecular mass distribution are conserved whether hemp or euphorbia are single treated or in combination. A second treatment was applied to investigate the effect of prolonged treatment on extracted lignins and the possible interactions. Aggregation, resulting in higher molecular mass, is observed whatever the feedstocks combination. However, mixing biomass does not affect chemical structures of the end product. Therefore, our paper suggests the possibility of gathering lignocellulosic residues during alkali process for lignin extraction and valorization, allowing to forecast lignin structure and make assumptions regarding potential valorization pathway.

 

Keywords: Cannabis sativa, Euphorbia lathyris, biomass, biorefinery, hemp, lignin aggregation, multi-feedstock, pretreatment

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Abbasi T., Abbasi S. A. (2010). Biomass energy and the environmental impacts associated with its production and utilization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14, 919–937. 10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.006 – DOI
    1. Althuri A., Gujjala L. K. S., Banerjee R. (2017). Partially consolidated bioprocessing of mixed lignocellulosic feedstocks for ethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 245, 530–539. 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.140 – DOIPubMed
    1. Ashraf M. T., Schmidt J. E. (2018). Process simulation and economic assessment of hydrothermal pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of multi-feedstock lignocellulose – separate vs combined processing. Bioresour. Technol. 249, 835–843. 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.088 – DOIPubMed
    1. Behera B. K., Midha N., Arora M., Sharma D. K. (1995). Production of petroleum hydrocarbons, fermentable sugars and ethanol from tabernaemontana div aricata: a new fuel crop and renewable resource of energy. Energy Convers. Manag. 36, 281–288. 10.1016/0196-8904(94)00055-5 – DOI
    1. Bolton G., LaCasse D., Kuriyel R. (2006). Combined models of membrane fouling: development and application to microfiltration and ultrafiltration of biological fluids. J. Memb. Sci. 277, 75–84. 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.12.053 – DOI

Leave a Reply