Canna~Fangled Abstracts

The characteristics of Raman spectroscopy of isomer CBD- and THC-Au nanoparticles using the density functional theory

By November 30, 2020December 31st, 2021No Comments

doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2021.120682.

Online ahead of print.
Affiliations 

Abstract

The isomers cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) can both be extracted from cannabis. We use density functional theory to study the Raman activity spectra, frontier molecular orbitals, and molecular electrostatic potentials of CBD, THC, and their respective gold complexes. A “selectivity enhancement” phenomenon for the spectral peaks at frequencies of 1144 cm-1 and 1553 cm-1 in the Raman spectrum of the CBD-Aun complex, and at frequencies of 865 cm-1, 1335 cm-1, and 1553 cm-1 in the Raman spectrum of the THC-Aun complex, was observed and explained. The frontier molecular orbital energy gaps of CBD and THC are 5.4085 eV and 5.4461 eV, respectively, indicating that CBD is more likely to react than THC. The CBD/THC-Au complexes had the strongest chemical activities and greater charge transfer effects with an Au3 cluster. The most electronegative sites of CBD and THC were found from molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) mapping. It is assumed that these sites are the adsorption sites of the CBD/THC molecules and gold surface. The MEP of the CBD/THC complexes also demonstrates the charge transfer effect between CBD/THC and Au. Both the “selectivity” phenomenon in the Raman activity spectra of the complex and the above assumption are explained by a surface selection rule. The conformation of the CBD/THC molecules on the gold surface are determined, showing that CBD is adsorbed vertically through the resorcinol structure while THC is adsorbed vertically through the tetrahydropyran and benzene ring.

 

Keywords: Cannabidiol, Density Functional Theory, Isomers, Raman Spectroscopy, Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

LinkOut – more resources


Leave a Reply